https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Learning Teach-Back in clinical practice: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals
Univ Gävle, Fac Hlth & Occupat Studies, Gävle, Sweden; Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden; Karolinska Univ Hosp, Womens Hlth & Allied Hlth Profess Theme, Huddinge, Sweden.
Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden; Reg Stockholm, Res & Dev Unit Older Persons, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden; Dalarna Univ, Sch Hlth & Welf, Falun, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0581-2895
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: BMC Medical Education, E-ISSN 1472-6920, Vol. 26, no 1, article id 1432Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Teach-Back is a widely recommended communication method to support patient understanding, yet little is known about how healthcare professionals learn Teach-Back in everyday clinical practice. The study aimed to explore how healthcare professionals learn Teach Back within an acute hospital setting, and how this learning is experienced and enacted in everyday clinical practice.Methods This qualitative study invited staff in two healthcare settings that had partaken in a Teach-Back method training program. Participants included 18 healthcare professionals and four first-line managers. Data were generated through interviews conducted in the beginning and after the training program, and through observations of clinical encounters when applying the Teach-Back method. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.Results Learning Teach-Back was identified as a multilevel workplace learning process that developed through interactions between individual experiences, interpersonal learning processes, organizational engagement, and workplace conditions. This was reflected in four interrelated themes: (1) Individual level: Learning by doing and experiencing Teach-Back: authentic Teach-Back encounters with patients were critical for skill development but could trigger insecurity when Teach-Back was experienced as unnatural. Emotional responses, discouragement and "aha" moments, shaped whether healthcare professionals used Teach-Back or not; (2) Interpersonal level: Learning through feedback and shared meaning: recurring peer reflection and supportive feedback were crucial for learning Teach-Back, yet often lacking; (3) Organizational level: Engaging the organization to promote learning: early adopters, ambassadors, leadership support, and interprofessional communication were decisive for learning Teach-Back; and (4) Workplace conditions: Making space for learning in a pressured work environment: staff shortages, turnover, and high workload constrained opportunities for doing and engaging in reflection and feedback about Teach-Back.Conclusions Learning Teach-Back can be understood as a multilevel workplace learning process that develops through opportunities for practice, reflection, and collegial feedback in everyday clinical work. Supporting Teach-Back learning requires workplace learning approaches that foster shared meaning across professional teams, organizational engagement, and protected space for learning.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02925871. Registration date: first submitted 8 April 2016; first posted 6 October 2016.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2026. Vol. 26, no 1, article id 1432
Keywords [en]
Workplace learning, Feedback, Health communication, Health literacy, Stroke prevention, Organizational learning, Practice-based learning, Qualitative method
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-79015DOI: 10.1186/s12909-026-10315-6ISI: 001868884100001PubMedID: 42706547Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105049550214OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-79015DiVA, id: diva2:2101777
Available from: 2026-09-16 Created: 2026-09-16 Last updated: 2026-09-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1369 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1369 kBChecksum SHA-512
1a73bac9bff8fc8547017ea56d5437eaeb0d0c0fd3eea78ff535934df8238b6d3c828b02d1addff503f46d077ac96e9ff60c519164c6d08599bf6a04fd198a29
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lindblom, Sebastian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tistad, MalinLindblom, Sebastian
By organisation
Department of Health Sciences, Innovation and Design
In the same journal
BMC Medical Education
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 533 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf