https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Technical and economic analysis of integrating low-medium temperature solar energy into power plant
Tianjin University, Ministry of Education of China, Tianjin, China.
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6279-4446
Tianjin University, Ministry of Education of China, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin University, Ministry of Education of China, Tianjin, China.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Energy Conversion and Management, ISSN 0196-8904, E-ISSN 1879-2227, Vol. 112, p. 459-469Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Resource type
Text
Abstract [en]

In order to mitigate CO2 emission and improve the efficiency of the utilization of solar thermal energy (STE), solar thermal energy is proposed to be integrated into a power plant. In this paper, seven configurations were studied regarding the integration of STE. A 300 MWe subcritical coal-fired plant was selected as the reference, chemical absorption using monoethanolamine solvent was employed for CO2 capture, and parabolic trough collectors and evacuated tube collectors were used for STE collection. Both technical analysis and economic evaluation were conducted. Results show that integrating solar energy with post-combustion CO2 capture can effectively increase power generation and reduce the electrical efficiency penalty caused by CO2 capture. Among the different configurations, Config-2 and Config-6, which use medium temperature STE to replace high pressure feedwater without and with CO2 capture, show the highest net incremental solar efficiency. When building new plants, integrating solar energy can effectively reduce the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). The lowest LCOE, 99.28 USD/MWh, results from Config-6, with a parabolic trough collector price of 185 USD/m2. When retrofitting existing power plants, Config-6 also shows the highest net present value (NPV), while Config-2 has the shortest payback time at a carbon tax of 50 USD/ton CO2. In addition, both LCOE and NPV/payback time are clearly affected by the relative solar load fraction, the price of solar thermal collectors and the carbon tax. Comparatively, the carbon tax can affect the configurations with CO2 capture more clearly than those without CO2 capture. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 112, p. 459-469
Keywords [en]
Levelized cost of electricity, Net present value, Payback time, Post-combustion CO2 capture, Solar thermal energy, System integration, Coal combustion, Combustion, Costs, Economic analysis, Energy efficiency, Solar collectors, Solar energy, Solar heating, Thermal energy, Levelized cost of electricities, Post-combustion CO, Carbon dioxide
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-31101DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.037ISI: 000373245500042Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84956698682OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-31101DiVA, id: diva2:904351
Available from: 2016-02-18 Created: 2016-02-18 Last updated: 2017-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Li, HailongYan, Jinyue

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Li, HailongYan, Jinyue
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1339 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf