mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Permanent and temporary work practices: Knowledge integration and the meaning of boundary activities
Uppsala Univ. (IEO)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3761-8117
Jonkoping Int Business Sch.
Lund Univ.
2008 (English)In: Knowledge Management Research & Practice, ISSN 1477-8238, E-ISSN 1477-8246, Vol. 6, no 4, p. 260-273Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Knowledge integration is a critical topic in current knowledge management research and practice. Research on this topic focuses primarily on how knowledge is integrated within a work setting. A less researched area is knowledge integration between different work groups. The purpose is hence to describe and analyze how knowledge is integrated between different work groups. We present two intensive case studies – one permanent and one temporary (project) work settings – which were studied using a practice-based perspective. A main result of the study is that knowledge integration in the two cases was more complicated than the literature suggests. Both differences and similarities were found between the two cases. Differences were seen in the use of boundary spanning activities and boundary objects, whereas similarities were found in the organizational structures and mechanisms, that is, purposes, rules, and infrastructures, which facilitated the integration of knowledge and/or functioned as obstacles and impediments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 6, no 4, p. 260-273
Keywords [en]
knowledge integration, boundaries, temporary organization, permanent organization
National Category
Economics and Business Business Administration
Research subject
Industrial Economics and Organisations
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-22986DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2008.27ISI: 000207670100002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-56849102682OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-22986DiVA, id: diva2:666931
Available from: 2013-11-25 Created: 2013-11-25 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Maaninen-Olsson, Eva

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Maaninen-Olsson, Eva
In the same journal
Knowledge Management Research & Practice
Economics and BusinessBusiness Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 116 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf