mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effect assessment in work environment interventions: A methodological reflection
Ryerson Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Toronto.
Linköping Univ.
Mälardalen University, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology.
KTH.
2010 (English)In: Ergonomics, ISSN 0014-0139, E-ISSN 1366-5847, Vol. 53, no 1, 130-137 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper addresses a number of issues for work environment intervention (WEI) researchers in light of the mixed results reported in the literature. If researchers emphasise study quality over intervention quality, reviews that exclude case studies with high quality and multifactorial interventions may be vulnerable to 'quality criteria selection bias'. Learning from 'failed' interventions is inhibited by both publication bias and reporting lengths that limit information on relevant contextual and implementation factors. The authors argue for the need to develop evaluation approaches consistent with the complexity of multifactorial WEIs that: a) are owned by and aimed at the whole organisation; and b) include intervention in early design stages where potential impact is highest. Context variety, complexity and instability in and around organisations suggest that attention might usefully shift from generalisable 'proof of effectiveness' to a more nuanced identification of intervention elements and the situations in which they are more likely to work as intended. Statement of Relevance: This paper considers ergonomics interventions from perspectives of what constitutes quality and 'proofo. It points to limitations of traditional experimental intervention designs and argues that the complexity of organisational change, and the need for multifactorial interventions that reach deep into work processes for greater impact, should be recognised.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 53, no 1, 130-137 p.
Keyword [en]
ergonomics intervention, macroergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders, research methodology
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-20206DOI: 10.1080/00140130903349914ISI: 000273610600012Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-73949084941OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-20206DiVA: diva2:638465
Available from: 2013-07-30 Created: 2013-07-05 Last updated: 2013-07-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus
By organisation
School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology
In the same journal
Ergonomics
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf