mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The available evidence suggests the percent measure should not be used to study inequality: Reply to Norton and Ariely
Mälardalen University, School of Education, Culture and Communication.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7164-0924
University of South Carolina.
2013 (English)In: Judgment and decision making, ISSN 1930-2975, Vol. 8, no 3, 395-396 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this reply, we reiterate the main point of our 2012 paper, which was that the measure of inequality used by Norton and Ariely (2011) was too difficult for it to yield meaningful results. We describe additional evidence for this conclusion, and we also challenge the conclusion that political differences in perceived and desired inequality are small. © 2013. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 8, no 3, 395-396 p.
Keyword [en]
Measurement of judgment, Perceived inequality
National Category
Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-19158ISI: 000319657500016Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84878438522OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-19158DiVA: diva2:626590
Available from: 2013-06-10 Created: 2013-06-10 Last updated: 2014-06-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Scopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Kimmo
By organisation
School of Education, Culture and Communication
In the same journal
Judgment and decision making
Mathematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf