https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of Mesenchymal Stem Cells derived from Amniotic Fluid and Umbilical Cord
Mälardalen University, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology.
2011 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Abstract

Background

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are non-hematopoietic multipotent stromal cells that can differentiate into lineages such as adipocytes, osteocytes and chondrocytes. MSC are immune privileged and also possess immunosuppressive properties, which in combination with their differentiative properties makes them excellent candidates for tissue engineering, an alternative treatment solution for of congenital malformations. This study will investigate mesenchymal stem cells from amniotic fluid and umbilical cords to evaluate which tissue that is superior for tissue engineering.

Methods and Results

Mesenchymal stem cells were isolated from amniotic fluid (afMSC) obtained at routinely performed amniocenteses and from umbilical cords (ucMSC) collected at births from elective caesarean sections. afMSC were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium-low glucose (DMEM) and ucMSC isolated with 3 different protocols were cultured in two different media; modified Eagle medium Alpha (MEMα) and DMEM.

After expansion, the cell populations were characterized in regards to their phenotype, immunological properties, proliferative capacity and in vitro differentiation abilities.

Mixed lymphocytes culture (MLC) showed that the af and ucMSC were immune privileged and also possessed immunosuppressant properties. Furthermore, the cells cultured in MEMα suppressed the immune response to a greater extent than cells cultured in DMEM.

MSC from both sources showed varied differentiation potential towards the osteogenic and adipogenic lineages, but overall with low efficiency. All cells were positive for CD105, CD44, CD73 and HLA I and negative for CD45, CD31, CD14, CD80, HLA-DR and HLA II. MSC from uc were negative for CD34 and positive for CD90, whereas afMSC were intermediately positive for CD34 and CD90. The cells were cultured for 10 passages to investigate their proliferative capacity and their population doubling times were calculated. The average doubling time for afMSC was 49.3 ± 12,7 hours at passages 1 to 5, 42.3 ± 7.5 hours for ucMSC.

Conclusions

Based on this data we will in the forthcoming studies isolate cells from amitotic fluid using positive selection for various markers and culture the cells in MEMα. With these changes we hope to obtain a potent homogenous cell population that can be used in the treatment of congenital malformations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , p. 11
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-12734OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-12734DiVA, id: diva2:429656
Subject / course
Chemical Engineering
Uppsok
Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-10-12 Created: 2011-07-05 Last updated: 2011-10-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(895 kB)1427 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 895 kBChecksum SHA-512
9548f211be0614366bebcc7fd70e9b15542627f64d7c29dba4c180e210131a7810b7d7f6f36258e9bdb76f112a3cd637914bbbc53873a652b90c00c6778ad46b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1427 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 187 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf