mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Condition-related coping strategies in persons with spinal cord lesion: a cross-national validation of the Spinal Cord Lesion-related Coping Strategies Questionnaire in four community samples
Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Institute of Medicine.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5098-8489
University of Oxford, Isis Education Centre.
Private practice, Zurzach, Switzerland.
Stoke Mandeville Hospital, The National Spinal Injuries Centre, UK.
2007 (English)In: Spinal Cord, ISSN 1362-4393, E-ISSN 1476-5624, Vol. 45, no 6, 420-428 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Study design: Cross-sectional, questionnaire.

Objectives: Coping strategies employed to manage the consequences of a spinal cord lesion(SCL) have been found to be distinctly related to emotional well-being. However, research and clinical implications have been hampered by the lack of cross-validated measures that are directly related to the lesion and its consequences. This study investigates the psychometric performance of the SCL-related Coping Strategies Questionnaire in four different countries.

Setting: Austria, Germany, Switzerland and UK.

Methods: The study sample comprised 355 community residing persons with SCL. Multi-trait/multi-item analysis methods and non-parametric and parametric tests were used.

Results: The Acceptance coping scale showed satisfactory psychometric qualities, whereas there were some problems in the Fighting spirit scale and greater problems in the Social reliance scale. Compared with the Swedish developmental sample, Acceptance was used more in the four study countries. Consistent with the original sample, Acceptance and Fighting spirit coping correlated with fewer signs of emotional distress, persons lesioned 5 years or more tended to report more Acceptance than the newly lesioned and coping strategies were mainly unrelated to neurological status.

Conclusion: The English and German language versions of the Acceptance coping scale were valid and reliable, whereas some translated items in the Fighting spirit scale need to be revised. Translations of the Social reliance scale need to be thoroughly revised and retested. The results add further evidence to the literature on the stability of the link between adapting life priorities (ie Acceptance) and emotional well-being.  

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 45, no 6, 420-428 p.
Keyword [en]
spinal cord injuries; psychological adaptation; coping behaviour; mental health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-11272DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102003ISI: 000247080500005PubMedID: 17179976OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-11272DiVA: diva2:380726
Available from: 2010-12-22 Created: 2010-12-22 Last updated: 2013-12-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Elfström, Magnus
In the same journal
Spinal Cord

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf