mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Pain Belief Screening Instrument (PBSI): predictive validity for disability status in persistent musculoskeletal pain
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1912-3110
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5064-8820
2008 (English)In: Disability and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0963-8288, E-ISSN 1464-5165, Vol. 30, no 15, 1123-30 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive validity of a screening instrument measuring disability, self-efficacy, fear of movement and catastrophizing, for disability status in patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary health care physical therapy. Development over time of pain-related disability, pain intensity, self-reported work capacity and overall daily function for subgroups of patients was also investigated. METHOD: Prospective and correlational study, where patients (n = 168) with a pain-duration of 4 weeks or more completed the questionnaires and their cases were followed for 8 months to assess the variables of interest. For predictive validity of the screening instrument discriminant analyses were conducted. The development over time for subgroups was analysed by comparing scores at the first and second measurement. RESULTS: The PBSI correctly classified 72% of the subjects as High-disabled (n = 33) or Low-disabled (n = 110), as measured with the Pain Disability Index (Wilks' lambda = 0.848, p < 0.005). For pain intensity, self-reported changes in work capacity and overall daily function the discriminant analyses were not significant. The High-disability group had increased disability, unchanged pain intensity and decreased work capacity and daily function after 8 months. CONCLUSION: The predictive validity of the PBSI for disability was confirmed. In clinical use the PBSI could serve as a mean to obtain supplementary and clinically useful information.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 30, no 15, 1123-30 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-10771DOI: 10.1080/09638280701523200ISI: 000259103800006PubMedID: 19230133Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-51849107501OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-10771DiVA: diva2:361037
Available from: 2010-11-07 Created: 2010-11-07 Last updated: 2015-08-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandborgh, MariaDenison, Eva
By organisation
School of Health, Care and Social Welfare
In the same journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf