mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Towards Quality Assessment in Integration of Automotive Software and Electronics: An ATAM approach
Mälardalen University, Department of Computer Science and Electronics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8891-033X
Mälardalen University, Department of Computer Science and Electronics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2726-4503
Mälardalen University, Department of Computer Science and Electronics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3986-1196
2006 (English)In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Software Engineering and Practice in Sweden, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden, 2006Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In this paper we perform a pilot study of evaluation of integration strategies in an automotive electronics system context. We describe the problem of choosing integration strategy and we outline the use of the Architecture Tradeoff and Analysis Method, ATAM, for evaluating integration strategies.

We exemplify the use of the ATAM by evaluating the integration decisions concerning the physical connection of a theoretic example system; a computer controlled automatic gearbox. A utility tree describing the most important qualities of the product is elicited by interviews with system architects and product specialists at Volvo Construction Equipment. We show how an evaluation score card can be used to aid in integration decisions.

Also, perform preliminary analysis and provide some discussion points from the result. This early analysis shows that ATAM has weaknesses in that it is sensitive to errors in the elicitation process and that the weighting of the resulting scenarios can be coarse grained. One strength of the ATAM is that design decisions and quality goals become visible to many stakeholders. Our proposed use of ATAM does not include any cost or effort estimates, but only relative quality estimates.

In our pilot study example we find that the integration of a software component as opposed to integration of a whole ECU, ranks higher with respect to the desired qualities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006.
National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-6969OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-6969DiVA, id: diva2:236979
Available from: 2009-09-25 Created: 2009-09-25 Last updated: 2016-09-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Fröberg, JoakimAxelsson, Jakob

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fröberg, JoakimWallin, PeterAxelsson, Jakob
By organisation
Department of Computer Science and Electronics
Other Engineering and Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 53 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf