https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Simulation-Based Decision Support for Agrivoltaic Systems
Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Sustainable Crop Prod, Piacenza, Italy..
Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Sustainable Crop Prod, Piacenza, Italy..
Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Sustainable Crop Prod, Piacenza, Italy..
Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Sustainable Crop Prod, Piacenza, Italy..
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Applied Energy, ISSN 0306-2619, E-ISSN 1872-9118, Vol. 369, article id 123490Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this study, a framework to compare the performances of different agrivoltaic systems, or agriphotovoltaic systems, in a range of environments was developed and tested. A set of key performance indicators derived from simulations was combined in a multi criteria decision analysis approach. The agriphotovoltaic systems were then ranked based on their similarity to the optimal solution for a specific environment. Main key performance indicators were crop ratio, energy conversion per hectare, specific energy yield, water use efficiency, and initial capital expenditure. Four agriphotovoltaics, namely vertical, interspace mono -axial, overhead mono -axial, and an overhead bi-axial, with five pitch width for each agriphotovoltaic and cultivated with processing tomato, were modelled across five sites (from the North to the South of Italy) during a ten-year period. The different scenarios were simulated in Scilab, in which a radiation model and GECROS crop model were coded. Global irradiation distribution beneath modules, and thus crop yield, were more homogeneous in vertical and overhead mono -axial than in the other agriphotovoltaic. Processing tomato demonstrated high adaptability to shading and yield was marginally affected in most of the agriphotovoltaic system alternatives. Vertical and overhead mono -axial accounted for the least yield reduction when the same pitch is compared. Overall, overhead mono -axial APV with 6 m pitch ranked first in each site when a 0.7 crop ratio threshold was considered. This framework could serve as a valuable tool for assessing the performance of different solution of agriphotovoltaics systems and their compliance with national regulation, and economic and technical targets.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCI LTD , 2024. Vol. 369, article id 123490
Keywords [en]
Agrivoltaic, APV, MCDA, Crop model, Processing tomato, Irradiation distribution
National Category
Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-67892DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123490ISI: 001248792400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85194957526OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-67892DiVA, id: diva2:1877697
Available from: 2024-06-26 Created: 2024-06-26 Last updated: 2025-04-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Campana, Pietro Elia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Campana, Pietro Elia
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Applied Energy
Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 213 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf