https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Aided-speaking students’ unsolicited questions inteacher-fronted classroom talk: the use of speech-generating devices to ask questions
Mälardalen University, School of Education, Culture and Communication, Educational Sciences and Mathematics. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Speech-Language Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6410-1332
Department of Education, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4769-4479
2024 (English)In: Classroom Discourse, ISSN 1946-3014, E-ISSN 1946-3022, p. 1-24Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Using the framework of conversation analysis, this paper examinesaided-speaking students’ unsolicited speech-generating device(SGD)-mediated questions in teacher-fronted classroom talk. Theanalysis draws on a corpus of 18 h of video-recorded classroominteractions including 23 aided-speaking students using SGDs orpicture-based communication boards. In all, 5% of the students’contributions were unsolicited questions, produced by three students.The students were found to orient to turn transition relevanceplaces, but due to prolonged production time their questionsrisked sequential and topical misplacement in the ongoing classroomtalk and were vulnerable to misunderstandings. To addressthis problem, students activated the synthetic voice before finalisingthe question, claiming the interactional floor while securingtime to complete their utterance. They also refrained from activatingthe synthetic voice and instead made the question visuallyavailable for the teacher to read, thereby transferring the responsibilityfor answering the question to the teacher when sequentiallyand topically relevant. The study demonstrates the complex interactionalprocess of formulating SGD-mediated questions, sometimesrequiring that the teacher, assistants, and students engagein repair work and scaffolding to establish the meaning ofa student’s utterance. The findings imply that the treatment of nonspeakingstudents’ contributions as questions requires designatedteacher work.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. p. 1-24
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-66268DOI: 10.1080/19463014.2024.2322597ISI: 001187047000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85188462659OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-66268DiVA, id: diva2:1845477
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2021-01240Norrbacka-Eugenia Foundation, 849/21Available from: 2024-03-19 Created: 2024-03-19 Last updated: 2024-04-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Tegler, Helena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tegler, HelenaMelander Bowden, Helen
By organisation
Educational Sciences and Mathematics
In the same journal
Classroom Discourse
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 36 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf