https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Examining boundaries in a large-scale educational research-practice partnership
Mälardalen University, School of Education, Culture and Communication, Educational Sciences and Mathematics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3485-7371
Mälardalen University, School of Education, Culture and Communication, Educational Sciences and Mathematics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2964-6297
2023 (English)In: Journal of educational change, ISSN 1389-2843, E-ISSN 1573-1812Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research-practice partnerships (RPPs) are emerging as a promising approach for educational change by closing the gap between educational research and practice. However, these partnerships face several challenges, such as addressing cultural differences as well as relationship-building in a historically unbalanced relationship between researchers and practitioners. Scholars have argued that these cultural differences, also called boundaries, have learning potential if approached constructively, but that we need to know more about what characterizes them in an educational context. The aim of this study is to contribute to our understanding of frameworks for RPPs. By analysing 45 hours of video recordings from meetings in an RPP between four researchers and 300 practitioners, the study offers a characterization of seven different boundaries organized into three different boundary themes: a) prerequisites for collaboration, b) collaborative practices, and c) collaborative content. Moreover, the different boundaries affect the positioning of different actors in the RPP. For example, depending on the boundary expressed, teachers are positioned as either flawed implementers or co-inquirers. We argue that the boundaries and different participant positions within the RPPs they reinforce may affect their learning potentials.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023.
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-65222DOI: 10.1007/s10833-023-09498-2ISI: 001131760900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85180683508OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-65222DiVA, id: diva2:1823156
Funder
Mälardalen UniversityMälardalen UniversityAvailable from: 2023-12-30 Created: 2023-12-30 Last updated: 2024-02-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Conceptualising the boundary infrastructure of research-practice partnerships
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Conceptualising the boundary infrastructure of research-practice partnerships
2024 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overarching aim of this thesis is to contribute to the understanding of research-practice partnerships (RPPs). Specifically, focus is on the infrastructure that is set in place to facilitate organisational learning. It has been argued that RPPs are particularly promising in addressing the research-practice gap and achieving educational improvement. However, there are several challenges in structuring RPPs. Hence, there is a need for more knowledge concerning how this can be done. To respond to this call and address the aim of the thesis, I explore the dynamics of engaging in RPPs in two major ways. Firstly, I investigate a large-scale Swedish RPP with over 300 participants across three universities, eight municipalities and one private school authority. This provides an opportunity to address calls for research that is conducted from an external position by collecting video-recorded observations. Secondly, the thesis includes data from two systematic literature reviews mapping the field in relation to participant roles and research use. These reviews provide information on RPPs from an increasing amount of research describing the dynamics of RPPs which facilitates conclusions on the synthesised material. The result of this thesis maps the intricacy of RPP dynamics. These frameworks respectively map the intricacies of (1) boundaries, (2) discourses and positioning of actors, (3) roles and (4) research use as related to RPPs. These results are then used to extend our understanding of RPPs by contributing to an RPP framework proposed by Farrell et al. (2022). In summary, this thesis contributes (1) useful frameworks for reflecting on RPP structures and work and (2) extensive categorisations of different dimensions of RPPs, extending our understanding. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Västerås: Mälardalens universitet, 2024
Series
Mälardalen University Press Dissertations, ISSN 1651-4238 ; 404
Keywords
research-practice partnership; Educational partnership; educational change; collaborative research; practice-near research
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Didactics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-66014 (URN)978-91-7485-635-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2024-04-09, Gamma, Mälardalens universitet, Västerås, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-02-15 Created: 2024-02-12 Last updated: 2024-03-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(839 kB)68 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 839 kBChecksum SHA-512
8be0fc219a267bb26362d12917c5c4578839dd93123d19607accf40a43293a3f8f4e5c872bfb870c683f34de8b140ec6f3ed1c9facf0ea93e80edc7c3e76b8b2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sjölund, SimonLindvall, Jannika

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sjölund, SimonLindvall, Jannika
By organisation
Educational Sciences and Mathematics
In the same journal
Journal of educational change
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 68 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 290 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf