https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fearing fear itself: Crowdsourced longitudinal data on Covid-19-related fear in Sweden
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4161-0342
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Regional Museum of Skåne, Kristianstad, Sweden .
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5121-5325
2021 (English)In: PLOS ONE, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 16, no 7, p. e0253371-e0253371Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BackgroundThe Covid-19 pandemic has had unprecedented effects on individual lives and livelihoods as well as on social, health, economic and political systems and structures across the world. This article derives from a unique collaboration between researchers and museums using rapid response crowdsourcing to document contemporary life among the general public during the pandemic crisis in Sweden.

Methods and findingsWe use qualitative analysis to explore the narrative crowdsourced submissions of the same 88 individuals at two timepoints, during the 1st and 2nd pandemic waves, about what they most fear in relation to the Covid-19 pandemic, and how their descriptions changed over time. In this self-selected group, we found that aspects they most feared generally concerned responses to the pandemic on a societal level, rather than to the Covid-19 disease itself or other health-related issues. The most salient fears included a broad array of societal issues, including general societal collapse and fears about effects on social and political interactions among people with resulting impact on political order. Notably strong support for the Swedish pandemic response was expressed, despite both national and international criticism.

ConclusionsThis analysis fills a notable gap in research literature that lacks subjective and detailed investigation of experiences of the general public, despite recognition of the widespread effects of Covid-19 and its’ management strategies. Findings address controversy about the role of experts in formulating and communicating strategy, as well as implications of human responses to existential threats. Based on this analysis, we call for broader focus on societal issues related to this existential threat and the responses to it.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 16, no 7, p. e0253371-e0253371
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-65056DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253371ISI: 000668791400081PubMedID: 34197498Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85110318184OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-65056DiVA, id: diva2:1820094
Funder
Karolinska Institute, SFO-V project grantAvailable from: 2023-12-15 Created: 2023-12-15 Last updated: 2024-01-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tishelman, CarolHultin Rosenberg, JonasEriksson, Lars E.
In the same journal
PLOS ONE
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 54 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf