https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An integrated approach to evaluate the measurement capability and acceptability of acoustic emission sensors
College of Electromechanical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266061, China; Division of Operation and Maintenance, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 97187, Sweden.
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Innovation and Product Realisation. Division of Operation and Maintenance, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 97187, Sweden.
College of Economics and Management, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266061, China.
Qingdao Huihe Zhongcheng Intelligent Technology Ltd, Qingdao, 266108, China.
2024 (English)In: Measurement science and technology, ISSN 0957-0233, E-ISSN 1361-6501, Vol. 2, no 25132, article id 025132Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Acoustic emission (AE) is a pivotal technique in condition-based maintenance (CBM) and recent years have witnessed a significant surge in the deployment of AE sensors in industrial applications. With this increase in availability, there comes a substantial challenge: evaluating the measurement capability of sensors within specific applications. As such, this study identifies a critical need for a structured approach to evaluate the measurement capabilities of AE sensors and subsequently judge their acceptability against guideline criteria. To address this need, we present an integrated approach that systematically guides the capability evaluation of AE sensors, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative analyses. The qualitative analysis aims to scrutinize the diagnostic accuracy of sensors by assessing the detectability of features critical for diagnostics. The quantitative analysis leverages the Gage repeatability and reproducibility (Gage R&R) to statistically evaluate sensor characteristics. A comprehensive experimental study further investigates the impact of measurement sources on the sensors’ repeatability, and reproducibility. This study illustrates the qualitative findings regarding sensor’s diagnostic accuracy in both time and frequency domains, revealing promising performance in diagnostic-based evaluations. In quantitative analysis, we demonstrate the results of sensor capability in terms of repeatability and reproducibility, providing the variations of different sources in statistics-based evaluations. We thoroughly investigate the influence of significant factors, quantifying their contributions to the sensor’s measurement capability. Furthermore, we introduce metrics designed to assess sensor’s acceptability, according to explicit acceptance and rejection criteria. Our experimental results affirm that root mean square measurements are within acceptable ranges for both sensors, while spectral entropy (SE) measurements for PK15I sensor satisfy the acceptable level. For HZ136I sensor, however, SE measurements are deemed conditionally acceptable. Ultimately, the proposed approach provides a robust framework for the comprehensive evaluation of AE sensor measurement capabilities, offering invaluable guidance for sensor selection and enhancement in industrial applications.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Physics , 2024. Vol. 2, no 25132, article id 025132
Keywords [en]
AE sensors, CBM, Gage R&R, measurement capability evaluation, sensor acceptability, Air navigation, Condition based maintenance, Gages, Integrated control, Acoustic emission sensors, Diagnostic accuracy, Gage repeatability, Gauge reproducibility, Integrated approach, Reproducibilities, Spectral entropy, Acoustic emission testing
National Category
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-64949DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/ad0c47ISI: 001109270000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85177976578OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-64949DiVA, id: diva2:1817849
Available from: 2023-12-07 Created: 2023-12-07 Last updated: 2023-12-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lin, Janet
By organisation
Innovation and Product Realisation
In the same journal
Measurement science and technology
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 42 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf