https://www.mdu.se/

The integration of CO2 capture with biomass-fired power plants has attracted much attention due to its ability to achieve negative emissions. Waste-fired combined heat and power (CHP) plants with CO2 capture, on the other hand, has received little attention, and their potential remains unclear. This study aims to identify the possible range of the amount of captured CO2 and investigate the impact of CO2 capture on the performance of waste-fired CHP plants. Since heat is the primary product of CHP plants, it is important to maintain heat production unchanged when CO2 capture is integrated. Based on this prerequisite, two operating strategies (OS) were investigated, which correspond to the upper and lower boundaries of CO2 capture: OS1 was to maximize the amount of captured CO2 while keeping the heat supplied to the district heating (DH) network unchanged; and OS2 was to maximize CO2 capture while keeping both supplied heat and generated electricity unchanged. To obtain more accurate results regarding the CO2 capture, a dynamic model developed in Aspen Hysys™ was utilized to simulate monoethanolamine (MEA) based chemical absorption for CO2 capture. By using real dynamic data from a waste-fired CHP plant, dynamic simulation results showed that the highest amount of captured CO2, which was achieved in OS1, was 401 kton/year, corresponding to a CO2 capture ratio of 82%; while the lowest amount of captured CO2, which was achieved in OS2, was 99 kton/year, corresponding to a CO2 capture ratio of 20%. For OS1, the electricity generation was substantially decreased by 61%. When determining the negative emission, the emission resulted from the share of fossil fuel in the waste needs to be excluded. For the studied CHP plant, the fossil share was around 45%. As a result, only OS1 can achieve the negative emission, which was 181 kton/year; while OS2 still led to positive emissions. Compared to the plant without CO2 capture, the carbon intensity of heat was reduced from 0.405 ton/MWh to 0.091 ton/MWh in OS1 and 0.351 ton/MWh in OS2, while the carbon intensity of electricity was reduced from 0.409 ton/MWh to 0.072 ton/MWh in OS1 and 0.343 ton/MWh in OS2.