Use of evidence-based approaches in procurement and implementation of health and welfare technologies – a survey among Swedish municipalities
2023 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 23, no 1, article id 1024Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: Health and welfare technologies (HWT) are increasingly procured and implemented by public providers in Swedish municipalities, but it remains unclear if and how evidence for these technologies’ effectiveness is used in both processes. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of evidence in Swedish municipal public sector procurement and implementation of HWT. Methods: A telephone survey of 197 municipalities was conducted with questions regarding the use of evidence in both processes, as well as eventual support needs regarding its use. Standard definitions of HWT and evidence were provided prior to the survey. Response frequencies and percentage proportions were calculated per question. Lambda (Λ) values with corresponding significance values were calculated for associations between responses to selected questions and the size and type of municipality, with values of 0.01 to 0.19 designated as weak associations, 0.20 to 0.39 as moderate, and 0.40 and above as strong. Results: Sixty-four municipalities completed the entire survey. Consistent use of evidence for effectiveness of HWT occurred in less than half of respondents’ municipal public procurement processes. Two-thirds of municipalities did not have an established model or process for implementation of HWT that used evidence in any manner. More than three quarters of municipalities lacked a systematic plan for follow-up and evaluation of effectiveness of implemented HWT, and of those that did less than half followed their plan consistently. Most municipalities expressed the need for support in using evidence in HWT-related processes but did not consider evidence and systematic evaluation to be prioritized. Conclusions: Weaknesses and gaps in using evidence in procurement and implementation processes may create a legacy of sub-optimal implementation of HWT in Swedish municipal health- and social care services, and lost opportunities for real-world evidence generation. There was a clear indication of the need for unified national guidance for using and generating evidence in key HWT-related municipal processes and implementation. Such guidance needs to be developed and effectively communicated.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central Ltd , 2023. Vol. 23, no 1, article id 1024
Keywords [en]
Evidence, Health and welfare technology, Implementation, Municipal health and social care, Procurement, Sweden, Biomedical Technology, Cities, Humans, Public Sector, Social Work, adult, article, city, comparative effectiveness, follow up, health survey, human, social care, telephone interview, welfare, medical technology
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-64440DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10021-9ISI: 001070883100002PubMedID: 37740220Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85171846362OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-64440DiVA, id: diva2:1802766
2023-10-052023-10-052023-10-11Bibliographically approved