https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Who Counts as a Sexual Subject?: The Impact of Ableist Rhetoric for People with Intellectual Disability in Sweden
Lund University, School of Social Work, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8526-3659
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Health and Welfare. (HAL)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7131-239x
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Health and Welfare. (WELFARE)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1813-4977
2023 (English)In: Sexuality Research & Social Policy, ISSN 1868-9884, E-ISSN 1553-6610Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Introduction The ableist rhetoric around sexuality in disability services and beyond can hinder subjective sexual expression and have a powerful impact on health, self-esteem, and everyday life through internalized ableism, structural marginalization, and interpersonal discrimination. The aim of this study was to explore the ableist rhetoric of sexuality and its impacton sexual scripting for people with intellectual disability.

Methods A thematic analysis was carried out on data generated through ethnographic fieldwork at five sheltered accommodations and semi-structured interviews with ten individuals with intellectual disability.

Results The results show that people in Sweden with intellectual disability are desexualized within a moral order that ismaintained in post-institutional social care. Through this moral order, which is deeply embedded in an ableist rhetoric about sexual relationships, sexual scripting for disabled people is constrained both inside post-institutional social care initiatives, and in the broader community of “ableist environments.” In response, disabled people employ various strategies of resistance.

Conclusions A rhetoric of positive sexuality should be a guiding principle for successfully supporting the development of sexual agency on each individual’s own term.

Policy Implications We conclude by encouraging the development of initiatives that will empower and support people with intellectual disability to learn about their sexual rights and to find solutions that allow for development of sexual agencyand subjectivity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023.
Keywords [en]
Sexuality; Ableism; Sexual scripts; Post-institutional disability services; Intellectual disability
National Category
Sociology Social Work
Research subject
Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-64154DOI: 10.1007/s13178-023-00873-5ISI: 001056312400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85169313771OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-64154DiVA, id: diva2:1793946
Funder
Mälardalen UniversityUppsala UniversityForte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2018–01830Available from: 2023-09-04 Created: 2023-09-04 Last updated: 2023-10-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Gäddman Johansson, RichardSvanelöv, Eric

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bahner, JuliaGäddman Johansson, RichardSvanelöv, Eric
By organisation
Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Sexuality Research & Social Policy
SociologySocial Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 304 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf