https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Deliberative safety for industrial intelligent human–robot collaboration: Regulatory challenges and solutions for taking the next step towards industry 4.0
Volvo AB, Group Trucks Operations division, Quality and Engineering function, Manufacturing Technologies department, Research and technology development group, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6490-8507
University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and Law, Gothenburg Research Institute, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2589-7964
University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and Law, Gothenburg Research Institute, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Volvo AB, Group Trucks Operations division, Quality and Engineering function, Manufacturing Technologies department, Research and technology development group, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2022 (English)In: Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, ISSN 0736-5845, E-ISSN 1879-2537, Vol. 78, p. 102386-102386, article id 102386Article in journal (Other academic) Published
Abstract [en]

In previous scholarly literature, safety is understood as a main obstacle for introducing human–robot collaboration in industrial production. This interdisciplinary paper is concerned with the safety and regulation of human–robot collaboration and contribute to this debate through a case study of stakeholders in Sweden, exploring the views of the involved stakeholders which is largely absent in previous research literature. The case study concludes that while stressing some potential benefits, stakeholders within the industry are generally reluctant to human–robot collaboration. Current regulation and safety standards are understood to be one of the prominent obstacles to such solutions. Based on the perspectives of the stakeholders as well as an analysis of current regulation and safety standards, the paper identifies the following problems with current regulation: (i) existing categories and conceptualizations used to guide safety evaluation are problematic, (ii) intelligence and autonomous aspects of collaborative systems are not sufficiently addressed, (iii) current standards do not enable evaluation of the trade off between safety, efficiency and flexibility, and (iv) the regulation has a lack of focus on active safety and using the control system as a safety measure.

In an attempt to address these identified problems, the difference between traditional collaborative robots and intelligent human–robot collaboration is analyzed in the paper and a new safety approach is suggested, called Deliberative safety, which allows the humans and robots to switch between different safety measures based on the need for flexibility or efficiency to reach production goals. While considering system performance, we propose a taxonomy to better support the design of deliberative safety as well as five safety measures to use in a deliberative safety approach. These measures include available measures like perimeter safety, zone safety and reactive safety to more advanced measures like planned and active safety, and when used together, they can enable intelligent human–robot collaboration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 78, p. 102386-102386, article id 102386
National Category
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-63821DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102386ISI: 000819442500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85132344408OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-63821DiVA, id: diva2:1781283
Available from: 2023-07-07 Created: 2023-07-07 Last updated: 2023-08-25Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Risk Assessment and Safety Measures for Intelligent and Collaborative Automation
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Risk Assessment and Safety Measures for Intelligent and Collaborative Automation
2023 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In the truck industry, manual final assembly and material handling processes can be complex and crowded, making their automation difficult using traditional industrial robots. Collaborative robot systems, on the other hand, offer a flexible and user-friendly alternative that can free up human workers from repetitive and non-ergonomic tasks, allowing them to focus on more value-adding operations. Despite the considerable efforts made by researchers and within the industry to promote collaborative robots, they are often underused and their use is limited to handling simple automation tasks without perimeter fences.

The aim of this thesis is to enhance our understanding of human-robot collaboration and the challenges faced by complex industries when implementing intelligent and collaborative automation. The goal is to create a sustainable workplace where robots and humans can work together safely and efficiently in a flexible environment.

Through several industrial use cases, two demonstration setups were developed to identify a set of industrial challenges and requirements. These requirements include safe, efficient, and intuitive interactions, as well as deliberative and robust control, reliable communication, variant handling, and an efficient engineering process. However, the most critical requirement is ensuring the safety of both machines and humans. It was found that current safety standards trade safety for efficiency, flexibility, and cost, which limits the implementation of intelligent and adaptive collaborative systems in complex applications.

To address these issues, a new safety approach called deliberative safety is proposed, which allows for switching between different safety measures depending on whether flexibility or efficiency is required to attain production goals. A taxonomy is proposed to better support the design of deliberative safety, along with five safety measures ranging from currently existing measures like perimeter safety to planned and active safety. These measures can enable intelligent human-robot collaboration.

However, incorporating intelligence and using the deliberative safety concept may introduce new types of risks, which necessitates the development of new risk assessment and risk reduction methods. To address this, a risk assessment method based on reliability theory is combined with a novel method based on system theory to identify system requirements in the early stages of development and to identify risky scenarios and related risk reduction methods.

The findings of this research will be beneficial to manufacturing industries seeking to use intelligent and collaborative automation to increase flexibility when automating. Additionally, they will provide valuable inputs for the development of related safety standards and risk assessment procedures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Västerås: Mälardalen University, 2023
Series
Mälardalen University Press Dissertations, ISSN 1651-4238 ; 383
National Category
Robotics
Research subject
Computer Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-63827 (URN)978-91-7485-603-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2023-09-01, LV hallen, Volvo GTO, Göteborg, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Vinnova
Available from: 2023-07-13 Created: 2023-07-10 Last updated: 2023-09-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hanna, Atieh

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hanna, AtiehLarsson, Simon
In the same journal
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 58 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf