https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Developing a European longitudinal and interprofessional curriculum for clinical reasoning
Medical Education Sciences, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Instruct GGmbH, Munich, Germany.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, EDU Higher Education Institute, Kalkara, Malta.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, United States.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 152023 (English)In: Diagnosis, ISSN 2194-8011, E-ISSN 2194-802XArticle in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Clinical reasoning is a complex and crucial ability health professions students need to acquire during their education. Despite its importance, explicit clinical reasoning teaching is not yet implemented in most health professions educational programs. Therefore, we carried out an international and interprofessional project to plan and develop a clinical reasoning curriculum with a train-the-trainer course to support educators in teaching this curriculum to students. We developed a framework and curricular blueprint. Then we created 25 student and 7 train-the-trainer learning units and we piloted 11 of these learning units at our institutions. Learners and faculty reported high satisfaction and they also provided helpful suggestions for improvements. One of the main challenges we faced was the heterogeneous understanding of clinical reasoning within and across professions. However, we learned from each other while discussing these different views and perspectives on clinical reasoning and were able to come to a shared understanding as the basis for developing the curriculum. Our curriculum fills an important gap in the availability of explicit clinical reasoning educational materials both for students and faculty and is unique with having specialists from different countries, schools, and professions. Faculty time and time for teaching clinical reasoning in existing curricula remain important barriers for implementation of clinical reasoning teaching.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Walter de Gruyter GmbH , 2023.
Keywords [en]
clinical reasoning, curriculum development, faculty development, interprofessional, article, clinical article, curriculum, human, human experiment, learning, occupation, satisfaction, teaching
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-62039DOI: 10.1515/dx-2022-0103ISI: 000936157500001PubMedID: 36800998Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85148755876OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-62039DiVA, id: diva2:1742086
Available from: 2023-03-08 Created: 2023-03-08 Last updated: 2023-05-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Elvén, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Elvén, Maria
By organisation
Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Diagnosis
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf