https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating the extent of patient-centred care in a selection of ESC guidelines
Medicines Management & Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK..
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, Kings College London, London SE1 8WA, UK..
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia 46010, Spain..
Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway..
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, Vol. 6, p. 55-61Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AbstractAims Patient-centred care (PCC) is the cornerstone for healthcare professionals to promote high quality care for patients with cardiovascular conditions. It is defined as ’Providing care that is respectful of, and responsive to, individual patient preferences, needs and values, and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions’. PCC can improve patient outcomes and allow patients and healthcare professionals to manage care collaboratively using best available evidence. However, there is no clear understanding how extensively guidelines incorporate PCC recommendations. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incorporation of PCC into a selection of guidelines published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Methods and results Using a narrative literature review and expert consensus, the Science Committee within the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP) developed a checklist to determine PCC incorporation in clinical guidelines. Nine ESC guidelines were reviewed, with committee members independently evaluating five PCC aspects: patient voice and involvement, multidisciplinary involvement, holistic care recommendations, flexibility to meet patients’ needs, and provision of patient tools. The level of congruence in item ratings by experts was then compared. The incorporation of PCC using these respective five categories, ranged from 4% (patient tools) to 53% in the ’multidisciplinary involvement’ category. Conclusion Overall, the inclusion of PCC was low, indicating that patient perspectives and needs were less likely to be taken into account when developing, endorsing, or formulating recommendations. Future development of guidelines should ensure better incorporation of patients’ perspective, in particular, and other PCC aspects highlighted in this study.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 6, p. 55-61
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-61885DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz025ISI: 000520507000011PubMedID: 31119288Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85078576515OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-61885DiVA, id: diva2:1736262
Available from: 2023-02-13 Created: 2023-02-13 Last updated: 2023-04-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Andreae, Christina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andreae, Christina
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 19 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf