https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prevalence of continuous integration failures in industrial systems with hardware-in-the-loop testing
Ericsson Ab, Sweden; Kth Royal Institute Of Technology, Sweden.
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Embedded Systems. Ericsson Ab, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5070-9312
Ericsson Ab, Sweden.
Ericsson Ab, Sweden; Kth Royal Institute Of Technology, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Proceedings - 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops, ISSREW 2022, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2022, p. 61-66Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Faults in the automated continuous integration (CI) process can seriously impact the development of industrial code. To reduce manual intervention in automated CI processes, we want to understand better the CI systems' failure distribution to improve efficiency, reliability, and maintainability. This paper investigates failures in CI in four large industrial projects. We gather 11 731 builds over six months, identifying 1 414 failing builds. We also identify the distribution of different types of build failures in each of the four CI projects. Our results show that compilation is the most significant individual cause of failure with 47 %, followed by testing at 36 %. The checkout step with associated checks also incurs a non-negligible portion of failures with 12 %. Furthermore, we identify 14 distinct types of failures in the testing step. We conclude that configuration problems are a significant issue, as pipeline scripting and dependency errors make up a large number of failures. © 2022 IEEE.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2022. p. 61-66
Keywords [en]
continuous integration, embedded system, failure classification, industry study, Integration, Integration testing, Continuous integrations, Embedded-system, Hardware-in-the-loop testing, Industrial codes, Industrial systems, Integration process, Integration systems, Manual intervention, Embedded systems
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-61724DOI: 10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00040ISI: 000909333700011Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85146335651ISBN: 9781665476799 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-61724DiVA, id: diva2:1732998
Conference
33rd IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops, ISSREW 2022, Virtual, Online, 31 October 2022 through 3 November 2022
Available from: 2023-02-01 Created: 2023-02-01 Last updated: 2023-03-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Eldh, Sigrid

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eldh, Sigrid
By organisation
Embedded Systems
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf