https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Agreement between participation ratings of children with intellectual disabilities and their primary caregivers
Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, University of Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6170-4763
CHILD Research Group, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, School of Health and Welfare, Jönkoping University Sweden, Sweden. (ChiP, CHILD)
Centre for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
CHILD Research Group, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, School of Health and Welfare, Jönkoping University Sweden, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Research in Developmental Disabilities, ISSN 0891-4222, E-ISSN 1873-3379, Vol. 104, article id 103715Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

Participation of children with ID it is argued must be understood in relation to the fit with the environment. Since caregivers are a vital factor within the close environment of a child with intellectual disability, their perceptions are unequivocally important.

Aims

The main aim of this study is to describe the self-reported participation of children with ID and the perceptions of their primary caregivers. Both frequency of attendance and perceived importance of activity was measured with self-reported and proxy-reports.

Methods & Procedures

A custom developed Picture my Participation (PmP) survey was utilised in an interview format with children with intellectual disability whilst their primary caregivers completed the survey independently.

Results

Overall, the perceptions of children with intellectual disabilities and of primary caregivers showed similarities regarding attendance and activities considered important. On group level, both children and primary caregivers perceived the child to have a high level of attendance ofFormal learning in school, Family mealtime, Interacting with family and Celebrations. An overall poor agreement in perceived frequency of attendance was found. However, in child-primary cargiver-dyads poor agreement in perceived frequency of attendance was found.

Conclusions

While primary caregivers and children’s ratings of attendance and selection of the most important activities appeared somewhat similar, there was a noted difference, in that primary caregivers’ were uniform in their selection, whilst there was a diversity in the selection of activities amongst children.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 104, article id 103715
Keywords [en]
Attendance, Intellectual disability, Participation, Picture my participation
National Category
Pediatrics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-61447DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103715ISI: 000556766500022PubMedID: 32574934Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086665273OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-61447DiVA, id: diva2:1724694
Funder
The Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT)Available from: 2023-01-09 Created: 2023-01-09 Last updated: 2023-04-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Andersson, Anna Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dada, ShakilaAndersson, Anna Karin
In the same journal
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Pediatrics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 58 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf