https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Breathing air consumption during different firefighting methods in underground mining environment
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center. Greater Stockholm Fire Brigade, Malmskillnadsgatan 64, Stockholm, 113 83, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5858-4377
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9598-0958
Division of Safety and Transport, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, PO Box 857, Borås, SE-501 15, Sweden.
Division of Safety and Transport, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, PO Box 857, Borås, SE-501 15, Sweden.
2022 (English)In: Fire safety journal, ISSN 0379-7112, E-ISSN 1873-7226, Vol. 133, article id 103661Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The paper analyses the breathing air consumption among participating firefighters during full-scale tests performed in the Tistbrottet mine in Sweden 2013. The availability of breathing air during firefighting has in earlier work been identified as a critical tactical factor in underground firefighting. Results from the tests show that there are differences in the breathing air consumption and that this depends on the methods used, equipment and the workload. The use of BA-teams, i.e. firefighters equipped with breathing apparatuses, is a complex group activity where the largest breathing air consumer will set the limits for the whole team. Light equipment and a structured command and control during the activities will enhance the endurance and the firefighting performance. Equipment and methods affect both firefighting performance and the durability of the firefighting activities. Examples of tested methods and equipment during the test series are: different variations of conventional hose lay-out; CAFS; cutting extinguisher; and trolley for equipment and complementary air. The aid of additional air supply and the use of trolleys will support the activities but is dependent on a large degree of preparation and training to function properly. Based on the tests, it is concluded that the larger model of air bottles should be considered for distances longer than 75 m. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2022. Vol. 133, article id 103661
Keywords [en]
BA-Operation, Breathing air consumption, Fire and rescue operation, Fire in tunnels, Underground firefighting, Durability, Fire extinguishers, Air consumption, Fire in tunnel, Fire operations, Mining environments, Performance, Rescue operations, Underground mining, Fires
National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-59937DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2022.103661ISI: 000884396300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85137168665OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-59937DiVA, id: diva2:1695594
Available from: 2022-09-14 Created: 2022-09-14 Last updated: 2022-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Palm, AndersKumm, Mia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Palm, AndersKumm, Mia
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Fire safety journal
Other Engineering and Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf