https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A systematic review shows minimal evidence for measurement properties of psychological functioning outcomes in whiplash
RECOVER Injury Research Centre and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence: Better Health Outcomes for Compensable Injury, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Region of Southern Denmark, and Specialized Hospital for Polio and Accident Victims, Roedovr, Denmark.
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Health and Welfare.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4537-030X
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, ISSN 0895-4356, E-ISSN 1878-5921, Vol. 151, p. 29-44Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically identify, synthesize, and appraise studies on the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for anxiety, depression, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, post-traumatic stress, self-efficacy, and stress in people with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). Study Design and Setting: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PILOTS, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (November 9, 2021). Studies evaluating any measurement property of relevant PROMs in WAD were included. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and assessed the measurement properties in accordance with the COSMIN guidelines. Results: Measurement properties of 10 PROMs were evaluated in WAD: Pictorial Fear of Activity Scale-Cervical (PFActS-C), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), PSEQ-4 item, PSEQ-2a, PSEQ-2b, Self-Efficacy Scale, Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, and Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale. Content validity was not examined in any of these PROMs in whiplash. Moderate- or high-quality evidence showed adequate internal structure for the PSEQ, PCS, and PFActS-C, whereas the original structures of the remaining seven PROMs were not confirmed in whiplash. Conclusion: Until further research on the measurement properties of these PROMs is available, researchers may opt to use the PSEQ, PCS, or PFActS-C if the construct is aligned with research aims. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Inc. , 2022. Vol. 151, p. 29-44
Keywords [en]
Internal structure, Measurement property, Patient-reported outcome measure, Psychological functioning, Psychometrics, Whiplash
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-59848DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.07.011ISI: 000861032300003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85136242025OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-59848DiVA, id: diva2:1691870
Available from: 2022-08-31 Created: 2022-08-31 Last updated: 2022-10-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Söderlund, Anne

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderlund, Anne
By organisation
Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 36 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf