https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Physical–cyber–human framework‐based resilience evaluation toward urban power system: Case study from China
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center. Business School Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0300-0762
Business School Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
South Kent School, South Kent, Connecticut, USA.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Risk Analysis, ISSN 0272-4332, E-ISSN 1539-6924, Vol. 3, no 4, p. 800-819Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Because the increased frequency, intensity, and duration of extreme weather events have significantly challenged power systems, there has been an increased interest in resilient power systems. This article establishes a multicriteria resilience evaluation framework for urban power systems from a physical-cyber-human system perspective, in which the two principal elements responsible for power system function degradation are described, the three major domains comprising urban power systems are explained, four core capacities that positively contribute to power system resilience are proposed, and 15 (11 objective and four subjective) power system resilience evaluation indicators are identified. Fuzzy hesitant judgment and a Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) aggregation method are employed to minimize the expert divergence and maximize the group consensus. A validation method is designed and a comparison with commonly applied performance-based and attributes-based evaluation methods is conducted. The applicability of the evaluation framework is verified using data from four Chinese municipalities: Shanghai, Beijing, Chongqing, and Tianjin. It was found that Shanghai's resilience was the best, and Chongqing's physical resistance disadvantages would result in the greatest difficulties in coping with extreme event disturbances. Physical, cyber, and human domain resilience enhancement strategies are given for different cities separately. This study provides a practical tool to evaluate, compare, and enhance power system resilience for governments and public utilities. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. Vol. 3, no 4, p. 800-819
Keywords [en]
multicriteria decision making; physical-cyber-human system; resilience evaluation; urban power system.
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-58291DOI: 10.1111/risa.13941ISI: 000790955000001PubMedID: 35512754Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85129236938OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-58291DiVA, id: diva2:1660649
Available from: 2022-05-24 Created: 2022-05-24 Last updated: 2025-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Yan, Jinyue

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Yan, Jinyue
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Risk Analysis
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 22 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf