https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
CLASSIFYING ANXIETY BASED ON A VOICERECORDING USING LEARNING ALGORITHMS
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering.
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering.
2022 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Anxiety is becoming more and more common, seeking help to evaluate your anxiety canfirst of all take a long time, secondly, many of the tests are self-report assessments that could cause incorrect results. It has been shown there are several voice characteristics that are affected in people with anxiety. Knowing this, we got the idea that an algorithm can be developed to classify the amount of anxiety based on a person's voice. Our goal is that the developed algorithm can be used in collaboration with today's evaluation methods to increase the validity of anxiety evaluation. The algorithm would, in our opinion, give a more objective result than self-report assessments. In this thesis we answer questions such as “Is it possible toclassify anxiety based on a speech recording?”, as well as if deep learning algorithms perform better than machine learning algorithms on such a task. To answer the research questions we compiled a data set containing samples of people speaking with a varying degree of anxiety applied to their voice. We then implemented two algorithms able to classify the samples from our data set. One of the algorithms was a machine learning algorithm (ANN) with manual feature extraction, and the other one was a deep learning model (CNN) with automatic feature extraction. The performance of the two models were compared, and it was concluded that ANN was the better algorithm. When evaluating the models a 5-fold cross validation was used with a data split of 80/20. Every fold contains 100 epochs meaning we train both the models for a total of 500 epochs. For every fold the accuracy, precision, and recall is calculated. From these metrics we have then calculated other metrics such as sensitivity and specificity to compare the models. The ANN model performed a lot better than the CNN model on every single metric that was measured: accuracy, sensitivity, precision, f1-score, recall andspecificity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. , p. 36
Keywords [en]
ANN, CNN, Machine learning, Deep learning, ML, DL, Voice recognition, Anxiety
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-57649OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-57649DiVA, id: diva2:1646518
Subject / course
Computer Science
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2022-03-23 Created: 2022-03-22 Last updated: 2022-03-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2968 kB)85 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2968 kBChecksum SHA-512
94c4d66ebc88901b008120683d039b1ef846194063ee9fc478180304e04200f0c5c297405467657f4a0a3856d41fadf81ae92002617311b1180e67eb5cbb4790
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sherlock, OscarRönnbäck, Olle
By organisation
School of Innovation, Design and Engineering
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 85 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 167 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf