https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
State-Space versus Linear Regression Models between ECG Leads
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Embedded Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0545-2335
Jožef Stefan Institute, Department of Communication Systems, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Embedded Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1940-1747
2021 (English)In: 2021 44th International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology, MIPRO 2021 - Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2021, p. 357-362Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The first attempts to modeling relationships between electrocardiographic leads, were based on measuring lead vectors by using models of human torso (deterministic approach), and by estimating liner regression models between leads of interest (statistical models). Among the most recent attempts, one of the most prominent is the state-space models approach, because of better noise immunity compared to mean squared error estimated statistical models. This study uses state-space models to synthesize precordial leads and Frank leads, from leads I, II, and V1. The synthesis was evaluated with the linear correlation coefficient (CC) on 200 measurements from the Physionet's PTB diagnostic ECG database. The results show better performance of regression models (mean CC between 0.88 and 0.96) than the state-space models (mean CC between 0.78-0.86). The leads were not pre-aligned for the R-peaks, which can be the main cause for the lower performances of state-space models, as a previous study has also shown. Residual baseline wander (after filtering) was the dominant reason for not obtaining better synthesis results with both methods. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2021. p. 357-362
Keywords [en]
ECG, electrocardiogram, lead reconstruction, lead synthesis, linear regression, signal estimation, state-space models
National Category
Medical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-57197DOI: 10.23919/MIPRO52101.2021.9596797Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85123052842ISBN: 9789532331011 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-57197DiVA, id: diva2:1634324
Conference
44th International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology, MIPRO 2021, 27 September 2021 through 1 October 2021
Available from: 2022-02-02 Created: 2022-02-02 Last updated: 2022-11-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Tomasic, IvanLindén, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tomasic, IvanLindén, Maria
By organisation
Embedded Systems
Medical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 51 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf