https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative evaluation and policy analysis for recycling retired EV batteries with different collection modes
China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Changping, Beijing, China.
China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Changping, Beijing, China.
London Business School, Regent's Park, London, United Kingdom.
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6279-4446
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Applied Energy, ISSN 0306-2619, E-ISSN 1872-9118, Vol. 303, article id 117614Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

With the rapid adoption of Electric Vehicles (EVs), numerous lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are reaching retirement age, leading to increasing concerns about the sustainable industrial development. To promote the recycling of LIBs, a reward-penalty mechanism is proposed in this work and analyzed by using the Stackelberg game theory. Six collection modes are considered and compared, including the collection activities undertaken by different stakeholders, i.e. the EV manufacturer, the EV retailer, the third-party enterprise, and the pairwise partners of them. The results show that: (i) a partnership between the manufacturer and retailer can achieve the highest actual collection rate and the total welfare; (ii) although increasing the reward-penalty intensity can contribute to higher collection rates, the total welfare can still fall, due to the negative influences of policy expenditure and implementation cost; (iii) the impact of raising the collection rate target is similar to the reward-penalty intensity, which can first promote and then restrain the growth of total welfare, and the drop is mainly due to the negative influences of corporate profits and implementation cost.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2021. Vol. 303, article id 117614
Keywords [en]
Battery recycling, Collection modes, Electric vehicles, Game theory, Retired batteries, Automobile manufacture, Electronic Waste, Lithium-ion batteries, Collection rates, Comparative evaluations, Implementation cost, Ion batteries, Lithium ions, Policy analysis, Retired battery, Total welfare, Recycling
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-55826DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117614ISI: 000703515300007Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85113310757OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-55826DiVA, id: diva2:1592722
Available from: 2021-09-09 Created: 2021-09-09 Last updated: 2021-10-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Li, Hailong

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Li, Hailong
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Applied Energy
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 33 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf