https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Dynamic Smartwarch Step Counter For Detecting Walk In Elderly
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering.
2021 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

As people grow older their motor functionality tends to deteriorate. This deterioration often implicates a slower, more careful walk and the use of walking aids. One way to monitor a person’s health is by observing a person’s daily physical activity. This daily activity can be measured with the help of programs in wearable devices, such as a smartwatch step counter. Most conventional step counting algorithms aim to count steps from healthy humans with a standard gait. But because of the lower amplitude of the signals collected from an elderly person with deteriorated gait, many of these step counting algorithms will struggle to detect walk. At the same time, monitoring the activity level and walk is arguably even more important in elderly people, as it can be used in both preventive and diagnostic measures regarding the person’s health.In this thesis, an algorithm was developed that counted steps and classified accelerometer data into the four different types; no walk, normal walk, slow walk and walk with aid. The algorithm did this with the help of machine learning, signal processing methods and a dynamic threshold. The thesis aimed to answer how suitable acombination of machine learning and dynamic thresholding could be for the purpose of walk detection in elderly, and what the accuracy of the developed algorithm was. The result showed that the walk classification had an accuracy of 86.4%, while the step counting had an accuracy of 88%. Ultimately, it was concluded that more data was needed to properly evaluate and train the algorithm, but that it held protentional for future work to be done.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. , p. 26
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-55050OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-55050DiVA, id: diva2:1571244
External cooperation
Delphie LST AB
Subject / course
Computer Science
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2021-06-23 Created: 2021-06-22 Last updated: 2021-06-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rautio, Amanda
By organisation
School of Innovation, Design and Engineering
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 457 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf