https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A life cycle analysis techno-economic assessment framework for evaluating future technology pathways – The residential air-conditioning example
School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Commerce, China.
Energy Studies Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore; UNiLAB on Integrated Systems Analysis Tools, Singapore.
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center. School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Commerce, China; UNiLAB on Integrated Systems Analysis Tools, Singapore; School of Mechanical Engineering, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang City, Hubei Province, China.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6279-4446
School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Commerce, China; UNiLAB on Integrated Systems Analysis Tools, Singapore.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Applied Energy, ISSN 0306-2619, E-ISSN 1872-9118, Vol. 291, article id 116750Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Clarity on cost and environmental benefits of individual technologies evaluated in a systemic and systematic manner is necessary in communicating the results at the policy level so as to enable effective decisions. Yet, the highly complex nature of many energy modelling tools makes it difficult for non-specialists to interpret and make sense of their results. An integrated life cycle analysis and techno-economic assessment framework is proposed in this study, as a first step towards developing an alternative and potentially more intuitive energy systems modelling tool. The residential air-conditioning sector in the Southeast Asian context is used as an example to demonstrate the advantages of the modelling methodology in profiling future technology pathways. The use of best available R32 technology can lead to cumulative savings of 2195 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions in the region by 2050; while the best available R407C technology has an average cost of $40.85 per tonne of greenhouse gas abatement. In addition, our modelling tool is capable of profiling energy outlooks for emerging economies and will be further integrated with hourly energy analysis frameworks in the next steps of development. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2021. Vol. 291, article id 116750
Keywords [en]
Carbon abatement cost, Energy systems modelling, Life cycle analysis, Residential air conditioning, Techno-economic assessment, Technology pathway
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-53795DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116750ISI: 000640380600002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85103035580OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-53795DiVA, id: diva2:1541603
Available from: 2021-04-01 Created: 2021-04-01 Last updated: 2021-05-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Li, Hailong

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Li, Hailong
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Applied Energy
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 74 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf