Hybrid model-based and data-driven diagnostic algorithm for gas turbine enginesShow others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) , 2020Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]
Data-driven algorithms require large and comprehensive training samples in order to provide reliable diagnostic solutions. However, in many gas turbine applications, it is hard to find fault data due to proprietary and liability issues. Operational data samples obtained from end-users through collaboration projects do not represent fault conditions sufficiently and are not labeled either. Conversely, model-based methods have some accuracy deficiencies due to measurement uncertainty and model smearing effects when the number of gas path components to be assessed is large. The present paper integrates physics-based and data-driven approaches aiming to overcome this limitation. In the proposed method, an adaptive gas path analysis (AGPA) is used to correct measurement data against the ambient condition variations and normalize. Fault signatures drawn from the AGPA are used to assess the health status of the case engine through a Bayesian network (BN) based fault diagnostic algorithm. The performance of the proposed technique is evaluated based on five different gas path component faults of a three-shaft turbofan engine, namely intermediate-pressure compressor fouling (IPCF), high-pressure compressor fouling (HPCF), high-pressure turbine erosion (HPTE), intermediate-pressure turbine erosion (IPTE), and low-pressure turbine erosion (LPTE). Robustness of the method under measurement uncertainty has also been tested using noise-contaminated data. Moreover, the fault diagnostic effectiveness of the BN algorithm on different number and type of measurements is also examined based on three different sensor groups. The test results verify the effectiveness of the proposed method to diagnose single gas path component faults correctly even under a significant noise level and different instrumentation suites. This enables to accommodate measurement suite inconsistencies between engines of the same type. The proposed method can further be used to support the gas turbine maintenance decision-making process when coupled with overall Engine Health Management (EHM) systems.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) , 2020.
Keywords [en]
Adaptive gas path analysis, Bayesian network, Diagnostics, Gas turbine, Hybrid methods, Aircraft engines, Bayesian networks, Decision making, Digital storage, Energy storage, Erosion, Gases, Regression analysis, Turbofan engines, Uncertainty analysis, Collaboration projects, Data-driven algorithm, Engine health managements, Gas turbine applications, High pressure compressor, Intermediate pressures, Low-pressure turbines, Measurement uncertainty, Gas turbines
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-53485DOI: 10.1115/GT2020-14481Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85099791053ISBN: 9780791884140 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-53485DiVA, id: diva2:1529677
Conference
ASME Turbo Expo 2020: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2020, 21 September 2020 through 25 September 2020
2021-02-192021-02-192022-11-09Bibliographically approved