https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Social norms and cooperation in a collective-risk social dilemma: Comparing reinforcing learning and norm-based approaches
University of Oxford, School of Geography and the Environment, United Kingdom.
Collegio Carlo Alberto, Department of Social and Political Sciences, Italy.
Mälardalen University, School of Education, Culture and Communication, Educational Sciences and Mathematics. (MAM)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3896-1363
2020 (English)In: 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2020, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2020, p. 1403-1406Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Human cooperation is both powerful and puzzling. Large-scale cooperation among genetically unrelated individuals makes humans unique with respect to all other animal species. Therefore, learning how cooperation emerges and persists is a key question for social scientists. Recently, scholars have recognized the importance of social norms as solutions to major local and large-scale collective action problems, from the management of water resources to the reduction of smoking in public places to the change in fertility practices. Yet a well-founded model of the effect of social norms on human cooperation is still lacking.We present here a version of the Experience-Weighted Attraction (EWA) reinforcement learning model that integrates norm-based considerations into its utility function that we call EWA+Norms. We compare the behaviour of this hybrid model to the standard EWA when applied to a collective risk social dilemma in which groups of individuals must reach a threshold level of cooperation to avoid the risk of catastrophe. We find that standard EWA is not sufficient for generating cooperation, but that EWA+Norms is. Next step is to compare simulation results with human behaviour in large-scale experiments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2020. p. 1403-1406
Keywords [en]
Agricultural robots, Behavioral research, Disaster prevention, Reinforcement learning, Water management, Collective action, Human behaviours, Large scale experiments, Reinforcement learning models, Social scientists, Threshold levels, Utility functions, Well-founded models, Social robots
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-52653DOI: 10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223561ISI: 000598571700204Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85095739038ISBN: 9781728160757 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-52653DiVA, id: diva2:1502353
Conference
29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2020; Virtual, Naples; Italy; 31 August 2020 through 4 September 2020; Category numberCFP20RHC-ART; Code 16406
Available from: 2020-11-19 Created: 2020-11-19 Last updated: 2022-11-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Andrighetto, Giulia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andrighetto, Giulia
By organisation
Educational Sciences and Mathematics
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 71 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf