https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Getting caught between discourse(s): hybrid choices in technology use at work
Anglia Ruskin Univ, Lord Ashcroft Int Business Sch, Cambridge, England.;ARU, Fac Business & Law, Org & Technol, Cambridge, England.. (IPR)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1567-3294
Anglia Ruskin Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Cambridge, England.;ARU, Fac Sci & Engn, Construct Management, Cambridge, England..
Newcastle Univ, Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England.;Newcastle Univ, Informat Syst Management, Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England..
Northumbria Univ, Newcastle Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2731-2261
2020 (English)In: New technology, work and employment, ISSN 0268-1072, E-ISSN 1468-005X, Vol. 35, no 1, p. 80-96Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Winner (1977, Autonomous Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 77), in defense of technology determinism, cautioned against 'throwing out the baby with the methodological bathwater'. His concern was that in so doing STS research would underplay, or be unable to account for, the effects that technology change does have on society. We similarly now find that powerful explanatory concepts like 'structural-discourse' have been largely expunged from the contemporary STS analytical lexicon; with consequences, we believe, for our ability as researchers to interpret and explain the rapid change we see in contemporary work places. In this paper we make the case for the continued use of a strong structural-discourse theory alongside other emergent forms of discourse. We show how workers, responding to conflicting and different types of discourse, produce varying hybrid responses-actions that react to and combine elements of emergent and structural discourses. Our work considers the implications of this finding for contemporary STS theory.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
WILEY , 2020. Vol. 35, no 1, p. 80-96
Keywords [en]
communications, discourse, sociomaterial, mobile phones, communities of practice, repair workers
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-51088DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12152ISI: 000492281600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85074665490OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-51088DiVA, id: diva2:1473890
Available from: 2020-10-07 Created: 2020-10-07 Last updated: 2023-01-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ivory, Chris

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ivory, ChrisWatson, Kayleigh
In the same journal
New technology, work and employment
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 77 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf