https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review
Anglia Ruskin Univ, Cambridge Campus,East Rd, Cambridge CB1 1PT, England.;Univ Appl Sci Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg, Switzerland..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8817-0148
Anglia Ruskin Univ, Innovat & Management Practice Res Ctr, Cambridge, England..
Anglia Ruskin Univ, Innovat & Management Practice Res Ctr, Cambridge, England.. (IPR)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1567-3294
2020 (English)In: JMIR mhealth and uhealth, E-ISSN 2291-5222, Vol. 8, no 2, article id e15935Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: There is a growing body of evidence highlighting the potential of mobile health (mHealth) in reducing health care costs, enhancing access, and improving the quality of patient care. However, user acceptance and adoption are key prerequisites to harness this potential; hence, a deeper understanding of the factors impacting this adoption is crucial for its success. Objective: The aim of this review was to systematically explore relevant published literature to synthesize the current understanding of the factors impacting clinicians' adoption of mHealth tools, not only from a technological perspective but also from social and organizational perspectives. Methods: A structured search was carried out of MEDLINE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the SAGE database for studies published between January 2008 and July 2018 in the English language, yielding 4993 results, of which 171 met the inclusion criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines and the Cochrane handbook were followed to ensure a systematic process. Results: The technological factors impacting clinicians' adoption of mHealth tools were categorized into eight key themes: usefulness, ease of use, design, compatibility, technical issues, content, personalization, and convenience, which were in turn divided into 14 subthemes altogether. Social and organizational factors were much more prevalent and were categorized into eight key themes: workflow related, patient related, policy and regulations, culture or attitude or social influence, monetary factors, evidence base, awareness, and user engagement. These were divided into 41 subthemes, highlighting the importance of considering these factors when addressing potential barriers to mHealth adoption and how to overcome them. Conclusions: The study results can help inform mHealth providers and policymakers regarding the key factors impacting mHealth adoption, guiding them into making educated decisions to foster this adoption and harness the potential benefits.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC , 2020. Vol. 8, no 2, article id e15935
Keywords [en]
telemedicine, smartphone, cell or mobile phone, electronic health record, workflow, workload, workplace, public health practice, technology, perception, health education, mHealth, mobile health, telehealth, eHealth
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-51086DOI: 10.2196/15935ISI: 000515089500001PubMedID: 32130167Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85081042660OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-51086DiVA, id: diva2:1473887
Available from: 2020-10-07 Created: 2020-10-07 Last updated: 2023-01-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Ivory, Chris

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jacob, ChristineIvory, Chris
In the same journal
JMIR mhealth and uhealth
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf