https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Paradoxes of person‐centred care: A discussion paper
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Health and Welfare. (COMCARE)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0407-9831
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Health and Welfare. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. (COMCARE)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4302-5529
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Health and Welfare. (COMCARE)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7839-7245
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Health and Welfare. (COMCARE)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1346-5670
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Nursing Open, E-ISSN 2054-1058, Vol. 7, no 5, p. 1321-1329Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIM: Previous research has mainly focused on the advantages of PCC and less on its disadvantages. Hence, there is a need to further explore the recent research regard-ing PCC from both sides. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to elucidate the advan-tages and disadvantages of PCC.

DESIGN: Discussion paper.

METHODS: We searched relevant literature published January 2000–March 2018 in PubMed, Medline, CHINAL, Scopus and Web of Science.

RESULTS: The results showed that PCC can contribute to improved health and well-being, improved mutual interaction in relationships, improved cost-effectiveness and im-proved work environment, while the disadvantages can involve increased personal and financial costs, exclusion of certain groups, increased personal and financial costs, exclu-sion of staff's personhood and unfairness due to empathy. An analysis of the existing literature on PCC showed paradoxes, which call for further investigation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 7, no 5, p. 1321-1329
Keywords [en]
clinical practice, concept, evidence, healthcare, person-centred care
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-48639DOI: 10.1002/nop2.520ISI: 000539141600001PubMedID: 32802352Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086160592OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-48639DiVA, id: diva2:1439057
Available from: 2020-06-11 Created: 2020-06-11 Last updated: 2020-11-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Summer Meranius, MartinaHolmström, IngerHåkansson, JakobBreitholtz, AgnetaMoniri, FarahSkogevall, SofiaSkoglund, KarinRasoal, Dara

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Summer Meranius, MartinaHolmström, IngerHåkansson, JakobBreitholtz, AgnetaMoniri, FarahSkogevall, SofiaSkoglund, KarinRasoal, Dara
By organisation
Health and WelfareSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare
In the same journal
Nursing Open
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 239 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf