https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The concept of welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare
KTH.
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Health and Welfare. Malardalen University. (Priliv)
2021 (English)In: Disability and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0963-8288, Vol. 43, no 9, p. 1220-1227Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: An ageing population presents a challenge for municipal eldercare in Sweden due to difficulties recruiting staff and there being a strained economy. A strategy involving welfare technology is presented as one such solution. An important group to carry out this strategy involves those who work with welfare technology in municipal eldercare. In this paper we describe their perception of welfare technology, and the challenges and opportunities they perceive in utilizing it.

Methods: A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to all Swedish municipalities and answered by 393 respondents. Analyses show that the respondents were representative of the different professions who work with welfare technology within municipal eldercare.

Results: Welfare technology was perceived as being more reliable and safer than humans with regards to supervisions and reminders. The respondents acknowledged factors that slowed down the implementation of welfare technology in municipal eldercare organizations, such as resistance to change, lack of finances, lack of supporting evidence, lack of infrastructure, high staff turnover, difficulties with procurement and uncertainties about responsibility and laws.

Conclusions: We found that the people who work with and make decisions about welfare technology in municipal eldercare organizations were generally very positive about the deployment and use of such technology, but there appear to be problems within municipal eldercare organizations to realize this vision. The lack of structured implementation processes and coherent evaluation models indicates inequality of the access to welfare technology and, as a result, even though Swedish eldercare is publicly funded, the availability of welfare technologies and their usage differ between municipalities.

  • IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION
  • The research findings show that implementing welfare technologies in municipal eldercare must include transformed working processes and long-term strategies or they may lead to conflicts of priorities or unstructured implementation processes.

  • Structured implementation processes and coherent evaluation models are needed for equality of access and availability of welfare technologies in municipal eldercare.

  • High staff turnover negatively affects the deployment of welfare technology and the root cause of high staff turnover needs to be addressed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 43, no 9, p. 1220-1227
Keywords [en]
Welfare technology, perception, municipal eldercare, advantages, barriers, evaluation
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-46248DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1661035ISI: 000485406900001PubMedID: 31503509Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85073782127OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-46248DiVA, id: diva2:1375604
Available from: 2019-12-05 Created: 2019-12-05 Last updated: 2021-11-09Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Assistive technology and welfare technology explorations: Aspects of perception, utilisation and decision-making
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Assistive technology and welfare technology explorations: Aspects of perception, utilisation and decision-making
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Aims: The overall aim of this thesis was to explore decision makers’ and professionals’ perceptions, utilisation, and decision-making about assistive technology (AT) and welfare technology (WT) within the interprofessional field of care for older adults. Methods: A literature review was conducted, including nine peer-reviewed scientific articles (I), analysed with a qualitative descriptive method. A web-based questionnaire, answered by 393 officials and health care providers in municipal eldercare (II and III), was analysed using content analysis of the open-ended answers (II) and descriptive and inferential statistics of the closed-ended answers (III). A semi-structured interview with 24 decision makers was also conducted and analysed with thematic reflexive analysis. Results: The studies revealed a lack of evidence-based decision models to support assistive and welfare technology decisions, partly due to the context being complex and multifaceted. The technology was perceived as progressive and cutting-edge, while organizational structure and culture were perceived as regressive and resistant to change. The results revealed personnel working with WT were generally very positive toward new technology, although there were age, gender, participation, and professional differences. Study IV results revealed that supportive aspects, technology aspects, patient aspects, and knowledge aspects influence AT-organizations' decision-making. Although AT/WT has been portrayed to have the potential to solve the challenges of an aging population, the decision-making regarding AT/WT is complex and evolving. Increased communication between government, regions, and municipalities to support the development of guidelines would enhance the goal of a person-centred care. Conclusion: This thesis contributes to knowledge of decision-making models, focusing on GATE´s model (Khasnabis et al., 2015) applicable in AT/WT. Further development and deepen knowledge in the area of AT/WT appears as needed due to results showing that there is a lack of structured knowledge about the decision-making processes and evaluations of effects of AT/WT.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: E-print AB, 2021
Series
Mälardalen University Press Dissertations, ISSN 1651-4238 ; 333
Keywords
assistive technology, welfare technology, older adults, health care providers, content analysis, cross-sectional, thematic analysis, interdisciplinary health care professionals, decision-making, managers, utilisation, perception
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Care Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-53888 (URN)978-91-7485-505-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-05-28, sal C1-007 och digitalt via Zoom, Mälardalens högskola, Eskilstuna, 09:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Projects
HV3D
Available from: 2021-04-15 Created: 2021-04-15 Last updated: 2021-05-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Baudin, Katarina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Baudin, Katarina
By organisation
Health and Welfare
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 321 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf