mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Derailed or failed?: a closer look at reduced working hours as an occupational health intervention
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4771-8349
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
2015 (English)In: Derailed Organizational Interventions for Stress and Well-Being: Confessions of Failure and Solutions for Success, Springer Netherlands , 2015, p. 21-26Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In the Nordic countries, working hour reductions have been introduced as a possible occupational health intervention. We evaluated the effects of a working hour reduction from 37 to 30 h a week among 100 employees within older people’s care. The outcome evaluation was broad, including health check-ups and extensive questionnaires covering work climate, work-home balance, health-related measures, well-being, and health behaviors. The results showed no improvements during the 1-year project period, which raises the question whether the results are due to failure in implementation or theory. This chapter asks what is needed for considering a failure as a theory failure, that is, a default program theory in that the activities fail to bring the desired effects. It is suggested that the case described here may be one such example. In order to facilitate the separation of theory failure from implementation failure, we underscore the importance of program theory, also called theory of change or logic models. By scrutinizing the program theory before implementing an intervention, a critical evaluation of the mechanisms linking the intervention to various outcomes can be made. Also, the program theory is helpful for forming testable hypothesis that allows variation in process factors to be tested. © 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Netherlands , 2015. p. 21-26
Keywords [en]
Evaluation, Implementation failure, Theory failure, Working hours
National Category
Work Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-45681DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9867-9_2Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84944553645ISBN: 9789401798679 (print)ISBN: 9789401798662 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-45681DiVA, id: diva2:1364877
Available from: 2019-10-22 Created: 2019-10-22 Last updated: 2019-10-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Work Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf