mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Diet-related greenhouse gas emissions assessed by a food frequency questionnaire and validated using 7-day weighed food records
Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0543-5498
Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.;Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr, Boston, MA 02115 USA..
Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden..
KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Commun, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden.;Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA..
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Environmental health, ISSN 1476-069X, E-ISSN 1476-069X, Vol. 15, article id 15Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The current food system generates about 25 % of total greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), including deforestation, and thereby substantially contributes to the warming of the earth's surface. To understand the association between food and nutrient intake and GHGE, we therefore need valid methods to assess diet-related GHGE in observational studies. Methods: Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies assess the environmental impact of different food items. We linked LCA data expressed as kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e) per kg food product to data on food intake assessed by the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) Meal-Q and validated it against a 7-day weighed food record (WFR). 166 male and female volunteers aged 20-63 years completed Meal-Q and the WFR, and their food intake was linked to LCA data. Results: The mean GHGE assessed with Meal-Q was 3.76 kg CO(2)e per day and person, whereas it was 5.04 kg CO(2)e using the WFR. The energy-adjusted and deattenuated Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.68 and 0.70, respectively. Moreover, compared to the WFR, Meal-Q provided a good ranking ability, with 90 % of the participants classified into the same or adjacent quartile according to their daily average CO(2)e. The Bland-Altman plot showed an acceptable level of agreement between the two methods and the reproducibility of Meal-Q was high. Conclusions: This is the first study validating the assessment of diet-related GHGE by a questionnaire. The results suggest that Meal-Q is a useful tool for studying the link between food habits and CO(2)e in future epidemiological studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD , 2016. Vol. 15, article id 15
Keywords [en]
Validation studies, Reproducibility of results, Food frequency questionnaire, Weighed food record, Epidemiology, Greenhouse gas emission, Climate change, Life cycle assessment, Carbon dioxide equivalents, Sustainable diets
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-40669DOI: 10.1186/s12940-016-0110-7ISI: 000369630000001PubMedID: 26860262OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-40669DiVA, id: diva2:1246125
Available from: 2018-09-06 Created: 2018-09-06 Last updated: 2018-09-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Bälter, Katarina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sjors, CamillaHedenus, FredrikBälter, Katarina
In the same journal
Environmental health
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf