mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How do iLead?: Validation of a scale measuring active and passive implementation leadership in Swedish healthcare
Department of Learning Informatics, Management and Ethics, Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Health and Welfare. Department of Learning Informatics, Management and Ethics, Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Unit for Implementation and Evaluation, Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Learning Informatics, Management and Ethics, Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: BMJ Open, ISSN 2044-6055, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 8, no 6, article id e021992Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives This study aims to describe the creation of a scale-the iLead scale-through adaptations of existing domain-specific scales that measure active and passive implementation leadership, and to describe the psychometric properties of this scale. Methods Data collected from a leadership intervention were used in this validation study. Respondents were 336 healthcare professionals (90% female and 10% male; mean age 47 years) whose first-line and second-line managers participated in the intervention. The data were collected in the Stockholm regional healthcare organisation that offer primary, psychiatric, rehabilitation and acute hospital care, among other areas. The items for measuring implementation leadership were based on existent research and the full-range leadership model. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to evaluate the dimensionality of the scale, followed by tests for reliability and convergent, discriminant and criterion-related validity using correlations and multilevel regression analyses. Results The final scale consists of 16 items clustered into four subscales representing active implementation leadership, and one scale signifying passive implementation leadership. Findings showed that the hypothesised model had an acceptable model fit (Ï ‡ 2 (99) =382.864∗∗, Comparative Fit Index=0.935, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.911, root mean square error of approximation=0.059). The internal consistency and convergent, discriminant and criterion-related validity were all satisfactory. Conclusions The iLead scale is a valid measure of implementation leadership and is a tool for understanding how active and passive leader behaviours influence an implementation process. This brief scale may be particularly valuable to apply in training focusing on facilitating implementation, and in evaluating leader training. Moreover, the scale can be useful in evaluating various leader behaviours associated with implementation success or failure.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group , 2018. Vol. 8, no 6, article id e021992
Keywords [en]
CFA, full-range leadership model, Implementation leadership, scale, validation, adult, article, confirmatory factor analysis, criterion related validity, female, health care organization, hospital care, human, internal consistency, leadership, male, manager, middle aged, psychosocial rehabilitation, regression analysis, validation process, validation study
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-40263DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021992Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85049732309OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-40263DiVA, id: diva2:1233694
Available from: 2018-07-19 Created: 2018-07-19 Last updated: 2018-07-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
By organisation
Health and Welfare
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf