mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What is Community Operational Research?
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Innovation and Product Realisation. Univ Hull, Business Sch, Ctr Syst Studies, Cottingham Rd, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England.;Malardalen Univ, Sch Innovat Design & Engn, Eskilstuna, Sweden.;Victoria Univ Wellington, Victoria Business Sch, Wellington, New Zealand.;Univ Canterbury, Sch Polit & Social Sci, Christchurch, New Zealand.;Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia..
Univ Massachusetts, Dept Publ Policy & Publ Affairs, Boston, MA 02125 USA..
Univ Massachusetts, Dept Publ Policy & Publ Affairs, Boston, MA 02125 USA..
2018 (English)In: European Journal of Operational Research, ISSN 0377-2217, E-ISSN 1872-6860, Vol. 268, no 3, p. 771-783Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Community Operational Research (Community OR) has been an explicit sub-domain of OR for more than 30 years. In this paper, we tackle the controversial issue of how it can be differentiated from other forms of OR. While it has been persuasively argued that Community OR cannot be defined by its clients, practitioners or methods, we argue that the common concern of all Community OR practice is the meaningful engagement of communities, whatever form that may take - and the legitimacy of different forms of engagement may be open to debate. We then move on to discuss four other controversies that have implications for the future development of Community OR and its relationship with its parent discipline: the desire for Community OR to be more explicitly political; claims that it should be grounded in the theory, methodology and practice of systems thinking; the similarities and differences between the UK and US traditions; and the extent to which Community OR offers an enhanced understanding of practice that could be useful to OR more generally. Our positions on these controversies all follow from our identification of 'meaningful engagement' as a central feature of Community OR. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 268, no 3, p. 771-783
Keywords [en]
Community operational research, Community-based operations research, Engaged OR, Problem structuring methods, Process of OR
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-39199DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.014ISI: 000431164000002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-39199DiVA, id: diva2:1205214
Available from: 2018-05-11 Created: 2018-05-11 Last updated: 2018-05-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Midgley, Gerald

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Midgley, Gerald
By organisation
Innovation and Product Realisation
In the same journal
European Journal of Operational Research
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf