https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Professionalism, governance and inclusive education: A total population study of Swedish special needs educators
Karlstads universitet, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1905-5154
Uppsala universitet, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4793-871X
Uppsala universitet, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0027-084X
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: International Journal of Inclusive Education, ISSN 1360-3116, E-ISSN 1464-5173, Vol. 23, no 6, p. 559-574Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Prior research shows that special needs educators (SNEs) have had problems defining their occupational roles and jurisdiction, particularly regarding inclusive education. There are two occupational groups of SNEs in Sweden, namely special educational needs coordinators (SENCOs) and special education teachers. In this paper, we use the collective name SNEs to refer to both groups. Here, results from a total population study of Swedish SNEs are presented (N = 3367, response rate 75%). The aim is to explore differences in SNEs’ interpretation of school difficulties and if these differences are influenced by SNEs’ employment in different parts of the school organisation. Statistical cluster-analysis was used to categorise SNEs into five distinct groups based on how they view the problems of pupils in school difficulties. Key concepts employed in the analysis are, primarily organisational vs occupational governance in relation to professional jurisdiction. Findings suggest that SNEs are less unanimous in their views of school problems, than prior research indicates. The variance is partly due to where they work in the school organisation, but we also find indications that different groups of SNEs experience different forms of governance with regard to their professionalism. The results are important due to the scope of the data and method of analysis as well as the illustrated variance of professional values and situations of SNEs and the potential consequences for the development of inclusive education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2019. Vol. 23, no 6, p. 559-574
Keywords [en]
SNEs, inclusive education, special education, professional role, educational organisation
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-39141DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1441339ISI: 000465119200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85042350687OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-39141DiVA, id: diva2:1204030
Available from: 2018-05-05 Created: 2018-05-05 Last updated: 2023-03-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Magnússon, GunnlaugurAlmqvist, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Göransson, KerstinLindqvist, GunillaKlang, NinaMagnússon, GunnlaugurAlmqvist, Lena
By organisation
Health and Welfare
In the same journal
International Journal of Inclusive Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 127 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf