mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Challenges and propositions for research in quality management
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Innovation and Product Realisation.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3187-7932
Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2018 (English)In: International Journal of Production Economics, ISSN 0925-5273, E-ISSN 1873-7579, Vol. 199, p. 125-137Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

From its inception, the field of quality management (QM) has been characterised by practice-driven development. Although QM has reached maturity as a field of research based on empirical enquiry, its practitioners still struggle to adapt QM implementations to reap their benefits. This study aims to identify their challenges to better understand how contemporary QM research addresses them. We propose approaches to bridge the potential relevance gaps between research and practice. A Delphi study of QM practitioners in Swedish private and public organisations, several of which operate globally, generated 49 challenges. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to cluster these challenges into themes, and the literature was reviewed to investigate how each theme has been addressed in QM research. The empirical investigation identified three themes related to future QM challenges—organisations’ adaptability to rapid changes in the business environment, quality as a strategic concern for business owners, and managerial ownership of quality. By analysing these challenges, six propositions for future research were proposed to reduce potential relevance gaps. Future research should focus on how to make QM a strategic concern for owners, and explore how it can contribute to organisational ambidexterity and adaptability. Research should also determine how context influences the way QM is applied, and investigate how it can improve organisational learning and innovation. Finally, research should indicate how top managers can adopt the responsibilities of quality managers, and explore the ways the principal values of QM can be better integrated into organisations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V. , 2018. Vol. 199, p. 125-137
Keywords [en]
Ambidexterity, Delphi study, Organisational adaptability, Quality management, Relevance gap, Factor analysis, Managers, Business environments, Empirical investigation, Exploratory factor analysis, Organisational, Organisational learning
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-38848DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.020ISI: 000432905000011Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85043267321OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-38848DiVA, id: diva2:1190654
Available from: 2018-03-15 Created: 2018-03-15 Last updated: 2018-06-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(399 kB)58 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 399 kBChecksum SHA-512
60944e8a4ac98f0a4f848144918d95f17dbf32c652998043a82f48d24e3e7bede3a3db06fc163f887b59ea4c288db72ee62e261a92f5f4eeb6abe9708678464c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Fundin, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fundin, Anders
By organisation
Innovation and Product Realisation
In the same journal
International Journal of Production Economics
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 59 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 170 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf