https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Techno-economic feasibility of integrating energy storage systems in refrigerated warehouses
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Refrigeration Technology, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin, China.
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1351-9245
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6279-4446
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Applied Energy, ISSN 0306-2619, E-ISSN 1872-9118, Vol. 216, p. 348-357Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This work evaluates the techno-economic feasibility of integrating the cold energy storage system and the electrical energy storage system in a refrigerated warehouse for shifting the power consumption. A dynamic model has been developed in TRNSYS®. Based on the dynamic simulation, the performance and benefit of those two types of energy storage systems were compared. Results showed that, the integration of a cold energy storage can reduce the electricity consumption and operational cost by 4.3% and 20.5%, respectively. Even though integrating a battery system will increase the electricity consumption by 3.9%, it can reduce the operational cost by 18.7%. The capacity of the energy storage systems, the battery price and the peak electricity price had been identified as key parameters affecting the performance and benefit. To achieve a payback period less than 3 year, for the integration of a cold energy storage system, the peak electricity price should be increased by 25% from the current level, while for the integration of a battery system, the battery price should drop to 0.7 kRMB/kWh.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2018. Vol. 216, p. 348-357
Keywords [en]
Battery, Cold energy storage, Dynamic simulation and optimization, Electricity consumption shifting, Payback period, Refrigerated warehouses
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-38792DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.079ISI: 000429761700027Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85042331320OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-38792DiVA, id: diva2:1186886
Available from: 2018-03-01 Created: 2018-03-01 Last updated: 2018-04-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Li, XueqiangCampana, Pietro EliaLi, HailongYan, Jinyue

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Li, XueqiangCampana, Pietro EliaLi, HailongYan, Jinyue
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Applied Energy
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 74 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf