mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Interviewer Variability: Quality aspects in a case-control study.
Mälardalen University, Department of Caring and Public Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8793-6084
Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden .
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
2006 (English)In: European Journal of Epidemiology, ISSN 0393-2990, Vol. 21, no 4, p. 267-277Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Quality assurance and quality control are important for the reliability of case-control studies. Here we describe the procedures used in a previously published study, with emphasis on interviewer variability. To evaluate risk factors for acute pancreatitis, information including previous diagnoses and medication was collected from medical records and by telephone interviews from 462 cases and 1781 controls. Quality assurance procedures included education and training of interviewers and data validity checks. Quality control included a classification test, annual test interviews, expert case validation, and database validation. We found pronounced variations between interviewers. The maximal number of interviews per day varied from 3 to 9. The adjusted average (95% CI) number of diagnoses captured per interview of cases was 4.1 (3.8-4.3) and of controls 3.5 (3.4-3.7) (excluding one deviating interviewer). For drugs, the average (95% CI) number per interview was 3.9 (3.7-4.1) for cases and 3.3 (3.2-3.4) for controls (excluding one deviating interviewer). One of the fourteen interviewers deviated significantly from the others, and more so for controls than for cases. This interviewer's data ;were excluded. Nonetheless, data concerning controls more frequently needed correction and supplementation than for cases. Erroneous coding of diagnoses and medication was also more frequent among controls. Thus, a system for quality control of coding practices is crucial. Variability in interviewers' ability to ascertain information is a possible source of bias in interview-based case-control studies when "blinding" cannot be achieved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 21, no 4, p. 267-277
National Category
General Practice
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-3512DOI: 10.1007/s10654-006-0017-7ISI: 000237467700004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-33646541657OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-3512DiVA, id: diva2:116176
Available from: 2007-06-04 Created: 2007-06-04 Last updated: 2018-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Blomgren, KB.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Blomgren, KB.
By organisation
Department of Caring and Public Health Sciences
General Practice

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 100 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf