mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Towards Systematic Compliance Evaluation Using Safety-oriented Process Lines and Evidence Mapping
Finnish Software Measurement Association – FiSMA ry, Espoo, Finland.
Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland.
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Embedded Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6952-1053
Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: 24th European & Asian Systems, Software & Service Process Improvement & Innovation EuroAsiaSPI2 '17, Springer, 2017, 83-95 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The role of software is growing in safety related systems. This under-lines the need for software process assessment in many safety-critical domains. For example, the nuclear power industry has strict safety requirements for control systems and many methods are applied to evaluate compliance to domain specific standards and requirements. This paper discusses the needs of the nuclear domain and presents alternatives to develop a process assessment method that takes into account domain specific requirements. The aim is to provide an approach that facilitates the use of assessment findings in evaluating compliance with the do-main requirements and supports other assurance needs. Safety-oriented Process Line Engineering (SoPLE) is studied as a method for mapping assessment criteria to domain specific requirements. A binary distance metric is used to evaluate, how far a process mapping based method would solve problems found in com-pliance evaluation. Based on the results, SoPLE is applicable in this case, but process mapping is not adequate to facilitate compliance evaluation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2017. 83-95 p.
Series
Communications in Computer and Information Science, 748
Keyword [en]
Safety, Systems engineering, Process assessment, Process lines
National Category
Computer Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-37007DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_7ISBN: 978-3-319-64217-8 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-37007DiVA: diva2:1160421
Conference
24th European & Asian Systems, Software & Service Process Improvement & Innovation EuroAsiaSPI2 '17, 06 Sep 2017, Ostrava, Czech Republic
Projects
AMASS - Architecture-driven, Multi-concern and Seamless Assurance and Certification of Cyber-Physical Systems
Available from: 2017-11-27 Created: 2017-11-27 Last updated: 2017-11-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textLänktext

Authority records BETA

Gallina, Barbara

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gallina, Barbara
By organisation
Embedded Systems
Computer Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf