mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
When is it appropriate to reprimand a norm violation?: The roles of anger, behavioral consequences, violation severity, and social distance
Mälardalen University, School of Education, Culture and Communication, Educational Sciences and Mathematics. (MAM)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7164-0924
Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
2017 (English)In: Judgment and decision making, ISSN 1930-2975, E-ISSN 1930-2975, Vol. 12, no 4, 396-407 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Experiments on economic games typically fail to find positive reputational effects of using peer punishment of selfish behavior in social dilemmas. Theorists had expected positive reputational effects because of the potentially beneficial consequences that punishment may have on norm violators’ behavior. Going beyond the game-theoretic paradigm, we used vignettes to study how various social factors influence approval ratings of a peer who reprimands a violator of a group-beneficial norm. We found that ratings declined when punishers showed anger, and this effect was mediated by perceived aggressiveness. Thus the same emotions that motivate peer punishers may make them come across as aggressive, to the detriment of their reputation. However, the negative effect of showing anger disappeared when the norm violation was sufficiently severe. Ratings of punishers were also influenced by social distance, such that it is less appropriate for a stranger than a friend to reprimand a violator. In sum, peer punisher ratings were very high for a friend reprimanding a severe norm violation, but particularly poor for a stranger showing anger at a mild norm violation. We found no effect on ratings of whether the reprimand had the beneficial consequence of changing the violator’s behavior. Our findings provide insight into how peer punishers can avoid negative reputational effects. They also point to the importance of going beyond economic games when studying peer punishment. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Society for Judgment and Decision making , 2017. Vol. 12, no 4, 396-407 p.
Keyword [en]
peer punishment, social distance, consequentialism, aggression, anger
National Category
Social Psychology Other Mathematics
Research subject
Mathematics/Applied Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-36244ISI: 000406792100005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85026740417OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-36244DiVA: diva2:1133944
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2009-2390Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, 2015.0005
Available from: 2017-08-17 Created: 2017-08-17 Last updated: 2017-09-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Scopushttp://journal.sjdm.org/17/17127/jdm17127.pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Kimmo
By organisation
Educational Sciences and Mathematics
In the same journal
Judgment and decision making
Social PsychologyOther Mathematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 7 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf