mdh.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A popular misapplication of evolutionary modeling to the study of human cooperation
Univ Glasgow, Scotland.
Mälardalen University, School of Education, Culture and Communication, Educational Sciences and Mathematics. Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden. (MAM)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7164-0924
Stockholm Univ, Stockholm, Sweden.
2017 (English)In: Evolution and human behavior, ISSN 1090-5138, E-ISSN 1879-0607, Vol. 38, no 3, p. 421-427Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To examine the evolutionary basis of a behavior, an established approach (known as the phenotypic gambit) is to assume that the behavior is controlled by a single allele, the fitness effects of which are derived from a consideration of how the behavior interacts, via life-history, with other ecological factors. Here we contrast successful applications of this approach with several examples of an influential and superficially similar line of research on the evolutionary basis of human cooperation. A key difference is identified: in the latter line of research the focal behavior, cooperation, is abstractly defined in terms of immediate fitness costs and benefits. Selection is then assumed to act on strategies in an iterated social context for which fitness effects can be derived by aggregation of the abstractly defined immediate fitness effects over a lifetime. This approach creates a closed theoretical loop, rendering models incapable of making predictions or providing insight into the origin of human cooperation. We conclude with a discussion of how evolutionary approaches might be appropriately used in the study of human social behavior. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC , 2017. Vol. 38, no 3, p. 421-427
National Category
Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-35348DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.004ISI: 000399966800018Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85009961853OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-35348DiVA, id: diva2:1097924
Available from: 2017-05-23 Created: 2017-05-23 Last updated: 2018-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(225 kB)8 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 225 kBChecksum SHA-512
10d1929f70871a6896a349c3ddffdb40f2941511dd337d7c9442b054f058975ed25005e2158e4989690b3959b3964bc02e7464f92b2991237cbbd09ac57671c4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Eriksson, Kimmo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Kimmo
By organisation
Educational Sciences and Mathematics
In the same journal
Evolution and human behavior
Mathematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 8 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 24 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf