https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Employing battery storage to increase photovoltaic self-sufficiency in a residential building of Sweden
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1351-9245
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0300-0762
2016 (English)In: Energy Procedia, ISSN 1876-6102, Vol. 88, p. 455-461Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Photovoltaic (PV) or hybrid PV-battery systems are promising to supply power for residential buildings. In this study, the load profile of a multi apartment building in Gothenburg and the PV production profile under local weather conditions are compared and analyzed. Three different types of batteries, including lead acid, NaNiCl (Sodium-Nickel-Chloride) and Lithium ion, are studied in combination with the PV systems. It is found that Lithium ion battery system is superior in achieving higher Self-Sufficiency Ratio (SSR) with the same Life Cycle Cost (LCC). Achieving high SSR with the hybrid PV-battery system is unrealistic because of the seasonal mismatch between the load and electricity production profile. The capacity match between the PV and battery to maximize SSR was investigated, showing different trends under system LCC range of 0.1-40 Million SEK (1SEK≈0.12USD). The system LCC should be lower than 10.6 Million SEK (at the SSR of 36%) in order to keep the payback time positive. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 88, p. 455-461
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-34619DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.025ISI: 000387975200071Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85007524814OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-34619DiVA, id: diva2:1065116
Conference
Applied Energy Symposium and Summit on Low-Carbon Cities and Urban Energy Systems, CUE 2015, 15 November 2015 through 17 November 2015
Available from: 2017-01-13 Created: 2017-01-13 Last updated: 2023-08-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundblad, AndersCampana, Pietro EliaYan, Jinyue
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Energy Procedia
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 120 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf