From the Editors: Can I trust your findings? Ruling out alternative explanations in international business research
2016 (English)In: Journal of International Business Studies, ISSN 0047-2506, E-ISSN 1478-6990, Vol. 47, no 8, 881-897 p.Article in journal, Editorial material (Other academic) Published
The complex nature of international business research, with its cross-country and multilevel nature, complicates the empirical identification of relationships among theoretical constructs. The objective of this editorial is to provide guidance to help international business scholars navigate this complexity and ensure that readers can trust their findings. We provide suggestions for how to rule out alternative explanations, explaining key considerations not only in empirical analyses, but also in theory building and in research design. Our discussion covers both qualitative and quantitative studies, because we believe that it is imperative to understand how trustworthiness is established in both traditions, even for international business researchers who self-identify with only one. This enables scholars to have a broader scope of knowledge when interpreting past research in the field and to be more adept at explaining their design choices to a diverse audience.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 47, no 8, 881-897 p.
theory-method intersection, qualitative/quantitative comparisons, reliability, case theoretic approaches, controls, international business
Economics and Business
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-33691DOI: 10.1057/s41267-016-0005-4ISI: 000386320000001ScopusID: 2-s2.0-85010953762OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-33691DiVA: diva2:1047430