mdh.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Factors affecting the implementation process of clinical pathways: A mixed method study within the context of Swedish intensive care
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden .
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden .
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden .
Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för hälsa, vård och välfärd, Hälsa och välfärd. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden .ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0667-7111
Vise andre og tillknytning
2015 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice, ISSN 1356-1294, E-ISSN 1365-2753, Vol. 21, nr 2, s. 255-261Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Rationale, aims and objectives Clinical pathways (CPs) can improve quality of care on intensive care units (ICUs), but are infrequently utilized and of varying quality. Knowledge regarding factors that facilitate versus hinder successful implementation of CPs is insufficient and a better understanding of the activities and individuals involved is needed. The aim of this study was to explore the implementation process of CPs within the context of ICUs. Methods An exploratory design with a sequential mixed method was used. A CP survey, including all Swedish ICUs, was used to collect quantitative data from ICUs using CPs (n = 15) and interviews with key informants (n = 10) were used to collect qualitative data from the same ICUs. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used, and the quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated. Results The CP implementation was conceptualized according to two interplaying themes: a process to realize the usefulness of CPs and create new habits; and a necessity of enthusiasm, support and time. Multiple factors affected the process and those factors were organized in six main categories and 14 subcategories. Conclusions Bottom-up initiatives, interprofessional project groups and small ICUs seem to enhance successful implementation of CPs while inadequate electronic health record systems, insufficient support and time constrains can be barriers. Support regarding the whole implementation process from centralized units at the local hospitals, as well as cooperation between ICUs and national guidance, has the potential to raise the quality of CPs and benefit the progress of CP implementation.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2015. Vol. 21, nr 2, s. 255-261
Emneord [en]
clinical pathways, evidence-based practice, implementation, intensive care, organization, standardized care plans
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-27815DOI: 10.1111/jep.12301ISI: 000351871200013Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84925586222OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-27815DiVA, id: diva2:801484
Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-04-09 Laget: 2015-04-09 Sist oppdatert: 2019-06-26bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Nordgren, Lena

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Nordgren, Lena
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 57 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf